Solar
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Solar
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Solar
SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Drilling | Solar | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Solar |
| Market Cap | $866M | $1.84T | $23.06B | $2.34B | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $315M | $1M | $5.42B | $4.71B | $5.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-42M | $-498M | $1.67B | $638M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | -8.7% | 41.7% | 43.9% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | -367.6% | 33.0% | 31.1% | 0.1% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 7.5x | 12.0x | 6.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $188M | $0.00 | $499M | $4.49B | $7.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $98M | $2.80B | $76M | $1.91B |
SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 103.5 | +3.5% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 36.2 | -63.8% |
| Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) | 100 | 48.9 | -51.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPWR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FSLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
- 30.7% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 18.2%
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- PEG 0.32 vs FSLR's 0.39
- 49.8% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6%
CSIQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +97.1% vs SPWR's -42.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs CSIQ's -6.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs CSIQ's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.1% vs SPWR's -42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -44.6% |
SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • SOC leads 1 • SPWR leads 1 • CSIQ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 4402.1x SOC's $1M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, FSLR holds the edge at +23.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $315M | $1M | $5.4B | $4.7B | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$454M | $2.2B | $3.4B | $284M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$42M | -$498M | $1.7B | $638M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$611M | $1.7B | $934M | -$1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | -8.7% | +41.7% | +43.9% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -367.6% | +33.0% | +31.1% | +0.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | -391.5% | +30.7% | +13.6% | -1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | -480.4% | +30.8% | +19.8% | -29.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | — | +23.6% | -8.1% | -20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.3% | -5.4% | +65.1% | -33.9% | -3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 79% valuation discount to FSLR's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CIVI offers better value at 0.15x vs FSLR's 0.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $866M | $1.84T | $23.1B | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $1.84T | $20.8B | $6.8B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.25x | -3.07x | 15.10x | 3.24x | -11.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.10x | 7.50x | 12.04x | 6.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.49x | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.38x | 1.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.80x | — | 4.42x | 0.45x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2359.43x | 2.42x | 0.41x | 0.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.42x | 2.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSIQ's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -113.8% | +18.0% | +9.5% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.5% | -28.9% | +12.6% | +4.2% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.3% | -44.6% | +17.6% | +10.8% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | -37.5% | +15.9% | +12.1% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.05x | 0.68x | 1.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | -$98M | -$2.3B | $4.4B | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $98M | $2.8B | $76M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $0 | $499M | $4.5B | $7.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.57x | -2.28x | 53.51x | 2.80x | 0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.2% | +9.5% | -21.8% | -1.5% | -30.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.4% | -36.8% | +65.3% | +6.8% | +97.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.3% | +26.5% | +20.9% | -41.7% | -52.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.3% | +32.6% | +187.6% | +31.9% | -55.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.3% | +32.4% | +324.1% | -86.2% | +14.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.8% | +8.2% | +6.5% | -16.5% | -21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSLR and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIVI is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSIQ's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.51x | 1.39x | 1.10x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.27 | $35.00 | $285.99 | $37.45 | $34.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $3.72 | $125.80 | $25.38 | $8.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.9% | +36.7% | +75.0% | +73.1% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 45.8 | 64.3 | 54.8 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 5.4M | 2.1M | 22.4M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPWR as "Hold", SOC as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", CSIQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). CIVI is the only dividend payer here at 18.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.81 | $27.00 | $264.13 | $31.00 | $28.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 4 | 73 | 16 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +18.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $4.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +18.3% | +5.9% |
FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SPWR vs SOC vs FSLR vs CIVI vs CSIQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus First Solar, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Civitas Resources, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus First Solar, Inc. 's 0. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Canadian Solar Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CSIQ is approximately 104% more volatile than CIVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 180% for Canadian Solar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -6. 6% for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -387. 0% for Canadian Solar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus First Solar, Inc. 's 0. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc. (SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for First Solar, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SPWR, SOC, FSLR, CSIQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPWR or SOC or FSLR or CIVI or CSIQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 18. 2% yield). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIVI: -86. 2%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPWR and SOC and FSLR and CIVI and CSIQ?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CIVI pays a dividend while SPWR, SOC, FSLR, CSIQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.