REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $44M | $616M | $354M | $1.06B | $2.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $166M | $76M | $422M | $820M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $21M | $-10M | $-86M | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | -11.7% | 87.4% | 19.1% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 27.9% | 78.6% | 13.9% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 83.0x | — | — | 39.6x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $856M | $0.00 | $2.27B | $3.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $11M | $27M | $731K | $27M |
SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Piedmont Office Rea… (PDM) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SQFT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 11.4%
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 57.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- 51.0% 10Y total return vs HIW's -6.8%
- 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
Among these 5 stocks, LAND doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PDM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +26.5% vs SQFT's -40.7%
HIW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 42.45x
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.7%, current ratio 42.45x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs SQFT's -38.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs PDM's 1.08 | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs LAND's 6.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.5% vs SQFT's -40.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs SQFT's -5.3%, ROIC 4.4% vs -0.2% |
SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAND leads in 2 of 6 categories
SQFT leads 0 • GOOD leads 0 • PDM leads 0 • HIW leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOOD and LAND each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIW is the larger business by revenue, generating $820M annually — 46.8x SQFT's $18M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SQFT's -38.7%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $166M | $76M | $422M | $820M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $106M | $94M | $229M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $21M | -$10M | -$86M | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67,454 | $90M | $5M | $47M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | -11.7% | +87.4% | +19.1% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +27.9% | +78.6% | +13.9% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | +12.7% | -13.8% | -20.5% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +54.1% | +6.2% | +11.2% | +38.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +11.8% | +38.6% | -100.0% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -188.7% | +2.8% | +66.7% | -23.0% | -67.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, HIW trades at a 43% valuation discount to GOOD's 31.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LAND's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 26.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $616M | $354M | $1.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $1.5B | $327M | $3.3B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.56x | 31.02x | -33.62x | -12.67x | 17.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 82.97x | — | — | 39.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.78x | 12.36x | 3.46x | 10.88x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 3.82x | 4.65x | 1.88x | 3.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 1.76x | 0.53x | 0.71x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.17x | 50.62x | — | 16.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAND leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. HIW carries lower financial leverage with a 1.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQFT's 2.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIW scores 6/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.1% | +9.7% | -1.6% | -5.7% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +1.7% | -0.8% | -2.2% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +4.4% | +4.9% | +1.5% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +5.3% | +4.7% | +2.0% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.92x | 2.50x | — | 1.52x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $94M | $846M | -$27M | $2.3B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $11M | $27M | $731,000 | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $856M | $0 | $2.3B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 1.46x | 2.99x | 0.35x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GOOD and PDM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,870 for SQFT. Over the past 12 months, PDM leads with a +26.5% total return vs SQFT's -40.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PDM at 13.8% vs SQFT's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +21.6% | +8.8% | +2.4% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.7% | +0.7% | +11.2% | +26.5% | -5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | +43.8% | -27.5% | +47.5% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -9.7% | -43.8% | -39.2% | -20.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | +51.0% | +42.9% | -23.4% | -6.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | +12.9% | -10.2% | +13.8% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOD and PDM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDM's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDM currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.55x | 0.68x | 1.08x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.00 | $15.03 | $13.00 | $9.19 | $32.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $10.33 | $8.47 | $6.32 | $20.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +84.6% | +75.0% | +92.4% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 49.1 | 41.0 | 67.0 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 390K | 543K | 1.1M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOD and LAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOOD as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", PDM as "Hold", HIW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.8% upside for PDM (target: $10) vs 2.2% for GOOD (target: $13). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs PDM's 2.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 | $10.00 | $10.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 11 | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +11.4% | +6.7% | +2.9% | +7.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $1.44 | $0.66 | $0.25 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LAND leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
SQFT vs GOOD vs LAND vs PDM vs HIW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (39. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW?
On trailing P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation at 31. 0x. On forward P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -71. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +51. 0% versus SQFT's -74. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning PDM is approximately 97% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 149% versus 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -430. 9% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOD leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -2. 0% for SQFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) trades at 39. 6x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 43. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDM: 17. 8% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 2. 9% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM).
09Is SQFT or GOOD or LAND or PDM or HIW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 11. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +51. 0%, PDM: -23. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SQFT and GOOD and LAND and PDM and HIW?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SQFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.