Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SR vs ATO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
SR vs ATO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $5.09B | $30.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.47B | $4.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $358M | $1.35B |
| Gross Margin | 73.3% | 32.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 35.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $5.24B | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $204M |
SR vs ATO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 118.2 | +18.2% |
| Atmos Energy Corpor… (ATO) | 100 | 179.5 | +79.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SR vs ATO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.67 vs ATO's 2.52
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.32x
ATO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.8%
- 185.9% 10Y total return vs SR's 73.8%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.00, Low D/E 68.6%, current ratio 0.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 22.2x), PEG 0.67 vs 2.52 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.6% margin vs SR's 14.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (68.6% vs 154.3%) | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ATO's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.7% vs ATO's +16.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs SR's 2.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.7% |
SR vs ATO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SR vs ATO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 2.0x SR's $2.5B. ATO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SR's 14.5%. On growth, ATO holds the edge at +0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $864M | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $358M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.7B | -$2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +32.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +35.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +27.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -108.1% | -40.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.0% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.1% | +14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, SR trades at a 20% valuation discount to ATO's 24.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs ATO's 2.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $30.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $39.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.73x | 24.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.60x | 22.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.79x | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.56x | 17.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 6.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 2.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SR delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for ATO. ATO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SR's 1.54x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.54x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.2B | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $204M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.62x | 9.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATO five years ago would be worth $19,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,210 for SR. Over the past 12 months, SR leads with a +16.7% total return vs ATO's +16.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATO at 18.2% vs SR's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.7% | +16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.7% | +65.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.1% | +93.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.8% | +185.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ATO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATO is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SR's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATO currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs SR's 90.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | -0.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.31 | $192.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.94 | $149.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 338K | 833K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SR and ATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SR as "Buy" and ATO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for SR (target: $97) vs -3.0% for ATO (target: $179). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs ATO's 1.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $97.00 | $179.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 28 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.10 | $3.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ATO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SR vs ATO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SR or ATO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger pick with 12.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). Spire Inc. (SR) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Inc. (SR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SR or ATO?
On trailing P/E, Spire Inc.
(SR) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus Atmos Energy Corporation at 24. 7x. On forward P/E, Spire Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 67x versus Atmos Energy Corporation's 2. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SR or ATO?
Over the past 5 years, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) delivered a total return of +93.
7%, compared to +32. 1% for Spire Inc. (SR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATO returned +185. 9% versus SR's +73. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SR or ATO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
00β versus Spire Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning SR is approximately -1994% more volatile than ATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 154% for Spire Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SR or ATO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is pulling ahead at 12.
9% versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atmos Energy Corporation grew EPS 9. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SR leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SR or ATO?
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
5% net margin versus 11. 0% for Spire Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATO leads at 33. 2% versus 21. 2% for SR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SR or ATO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus Atmos Energy Corporation's 2. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Spire Inc. (SR) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Atmos Energy Corporation — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 12. 5% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SR or ATO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 9% for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO).
09Is SR or ATO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
00), 1. 9% yield, +185. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATO: +185. 9%, SR: +73. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SR and ATO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ATO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.