Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $141M | $602M | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $266M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $796K | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 55.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 6.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 53.8x | 10.7x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $992M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $12M | $343.34B |
SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SR Bancorp, Inc. Co… (SRBK) | 100 | 217.3 | +117.3% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 152.5 | +52.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 224.3 | +124.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRBK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 30.4%, EPS growth 138.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 0.07x
- NIM 2.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 3.7%
- Beta 0.67, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.36x
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.6x)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs SRBK's 105.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.4% NII/revenue growth vs NFBK's -26.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SRBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs JPM's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SRBK's 0.5% |
SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5496.3x SRBK's $51M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFBK's 0.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $266M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $25M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $796,000 | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $52M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +55.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +6.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +0.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +19.6% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | +68.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SRBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 98% valuation discount to NFBK's 727.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SRBK's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFBK's 63.2x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $141M | $602M | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $1.6B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.87x | 727.78x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.85x | 10.67x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.74x | 63.21x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.82x | 3.27x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.84x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.31x | 11.53x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $0 for NFBK. SRBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRBK scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +0.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +0.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +1.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.44x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $979M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $12M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $992M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.15x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,732 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, SRBK leads with a +46.0% total return vs JPM's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs NFBK's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | +29.5% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.0% | +28.5% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +43.4% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +7.3% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +28.9% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +12.8% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRBK and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.66x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $14.81 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.81 | $9.90 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +97.3% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 53.3 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 243K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFBK as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs 0.6% for NFBK (target: $15). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.65% vs SRBK's 0.28%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +3.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.53 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | +2.6% | +3.8% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SRBK vs NFBK vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRBK or NFBK or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SR Bancorp, Inc.
Common stock (SRBK) is the stronger pick with 30. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRBK or NFBK or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 727. 8x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRBK or NFBK or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +7. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus NFBK's +28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRBK or NFBK or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SR Bancorp, Inc.
Common stock (SRBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately 156% more volatile than SRBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock (SRBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRBK or NFBK or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SR Bancorp, Inc.
Common stock (SRBK) is pulling ahead at 30. 4% versus -26. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock grew EPS 138. 4% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRBK or NFBK or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 4% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 9. 3% for NFBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRBK leads at 66. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRBK or NFBK or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 53. 8x for SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock — 43. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 4. 5% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRBK or NFBK or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 3% for SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock (SRBK).
09Is SRBK or NFBK or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, SRBK: +105. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRBK and NFBK and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. NFBK, JPM pay a dividend while SRBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.