SREA vs DUK

For growth investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger pick with 6.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 9% for Sempra (SREA). Sempra (SREA) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (4. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sempra (SREA) is the cheapest at 7.

8x versus Duke Energy Corporation at 20. 2x. On forward P/E, Sempra is actually cheaper at 4. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) delivered a total return of +48.

9%, compared to +4. 6% for Sempra (SREA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DUK returned +107. 2% versus SREA's +24. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus Sempra's 0. 83β — meaning SREA is approximately -438% more volatile than DUK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sempra (SREA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 171% for Duke Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is pulling ahead at 6.

2% versus 3. 9% for Sempra (SREA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duke Energy Corporation grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Sempra. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUK leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus 13. 4% for Sempra — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUK leads at 26. 6% versus 23. 7% for SREA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUK leads at 31. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Sempra (SREA) trades at 4.

2x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Duke Energy Corporation — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sempra (SREA) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 3. 3% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 3. 3% yield, +107. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DUK: +107. 2%, SREA: +24. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SREA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.