SRI vs APTV

For growth investors, Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the stronger pick with 3.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI). Aptiv PLC (APTV) offers the better valuation at 76. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Aptiv PLC is actually cheaper at 9.

0x.

Over the past 5 years, Aptiv PLC (APTV) delivered a total return of -61.

6%, compared to -77. 7% for Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APTV returned +11. 0% versus SRI's -45. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

40β versus Stoneridge, Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning SRI is approximately 92% more volatile than APTV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aptiv PLC (APTV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 106% for Stoneridge, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aptiv PLC (APTV) is pulling ahead at 3.

5% versus -5. 2% for Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aptiv PLC grew EPS -89. 2% year-over-year, compared to -516. 7% for Stoneridge, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APTV leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

8% net margin versus -11. 9% for Stoneridge, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APTV leads at 5. 8% versus -2. 0% for SRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRI leads at 19. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Aptiv PLC (APTV) trades at 9.

0x forward P/E versus 29. 4x for Stoneridge, Inc. — 20. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APTV: +11. 0%, SRI: -45. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.