SRI
Stoneridge, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$215M
5Y Perf.-63.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SRI vs LEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LEA
Lear Corporation
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$6.85B
5Y Perf.+27.6%
SRI vs LEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SRI | LEA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $215M | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $861M | $23.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $528M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 5.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 29.3x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $190M | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $1.03B |
SRI vs LEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SRI
LEA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) | 100 | 37.0 | -63.0% |
| Lear Corporation (LEA) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRI vs LEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LEA leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Stoneridge, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SRI
Stoneridge, Inc.
The Income Pick
SRI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.72
- +73.3% vs LEA's +61.3%
Best for: income & stability
LEA
Lear Corporation
The Growth Play
LEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth -9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 38.9% 10Y total return vs SRI's -46.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 78.9%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LEA | -0.2% revenue growth vs SRI's -5.2% |
| Value | LEA | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 29.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | LEA | 2.2% margin vs SRI's -11.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LEA | Beta 1.14 vs SRI's 2.72, lower leverage |
| Dividends | LEA | 2.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SRI | +73.3% vs LEA's +61.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LEA | 4.0% ROA vs SRI's -16.6%, ROIC 9.7% vs -3.7% |
SRI vs LEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
SRI vs LEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLEALAGGINGSRI
SRIStoneridge, Inc.
0leads
LEALear Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SRIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LEA5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LEA7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LEA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
LEA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEA is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.5B annually — 27.3x SRI's $861M. LEA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRI's -11.9%. On growth, LEA holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SRIStoneridge, Inc. | LEALear Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $861M | $23.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $17M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $528M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $732M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +5.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.9% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +124.2% |
LEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SRI and LEA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LEA's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SRI's 20.3x.
| Metric | SRIStoneridge, Inc. | LEALear Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $215M | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $339M | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.06x | 16.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.27x | 9.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.26x | 6.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.65x | 12.99x |
Evenly matched — SRI and LEA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEA delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-44 for SRI. LEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRI's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEA scores 7/9 vs SRI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SRIStoneridge, Inc. | LEALear Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -43.5% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.6% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $124M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $190M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.25x | 7.55x |
LEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LEA five years ago would be worth $7,682 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,233 for SRI. Over the past 12 months, SRI leads with a +73.3% total return vs LEA's +61.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LEA at 4.3% vs SRI's -22.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SRIStoneridge, Inc. | LEALear Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.5% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.3% | +61.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | -23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.0% | +38.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.6% | +4.3% |
LEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEA is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRI's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LEA currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SRI's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SRIStoneridge, Inc. | LEALear Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.72x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.71 | $142.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.24 | $85.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 235K | 558K |
LEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SRI as "Buy" and LEA as "Hold". LEA is the only dividend payer here at 2.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SRIStoneridge, Inc. | LEALear Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $126.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +4.7% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LEA leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallLear Corporation (LEA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SRI vs LEA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRI or LEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lear Corporation (LEA) is the stronger pick with -0.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI). Lear Corporation (LEA) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRI or LEA?
On forward P/E, Lear Corporation is actually cheaper at 9.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRI or LEA?
Over the past 5 years, Lear Corporation (LEA) delivered a total return of -23.
2%, compared to -77. 7% for Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LEA returned +38. 9% versus SRI's -46. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRI or LEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lear Corporation (LEA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus Stoneridge, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning SRI is approximately 140% more volatile than LEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lear Corporation (LEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 79% versus 106% for Stoneridge, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRI or LEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lear Corporation (LEA) is pulling ahead at -0.
2% versus -5. 2% for Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lear Corporation grew EPS -9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -516. 7% for Stoneridge, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEA leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRI or LEA?
Lear Corporation (LEA) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
9% net margin versus -11. 9% for Stoneridge, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEA leads at 4. 4% versus -2. 0% for SRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRI leads at 19. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRI or LEA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lear Corporation (LEA) trades at 9.
4x forward P/E versus 29. 3x for Stoneridge, Inc. — 19. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRI or LEA?
In this comparison, LEA (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SRI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SRI or LEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lear Corporation (LEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
14), 2. 3% yield). Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEA: +38. 9%, SRI: -46. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRI and LEA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEA is a small-cap deep-value stock. LEA pays a dividend while SRI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SRI: -6.0% · LEA: 4.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.