Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Industrial - Machinery
Software - Application
Software - Application
SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware | Industrial - Machinery | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $707M | $389M | $3.95B | $321M | $17.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $551M | $118M | $741M | $279M | $3.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-338M | $-52M | $7M | $1.25B |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 34.4% | 39.3% | 57.1% | 84.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.7% | -61.8% | -4.8% | 2.9% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 69.8x | 185.0x | 117.0x | 29.9x | 19.2x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $9M | $349M | $66M | $1.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $205M | $15M | $134M | $184M |
SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 31.7 | -68.3% |
| Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Materialise N.V. (MTLS) | 100 | 22.6 | -77.4% |
| PTC Inc. (PTC) | 100 | 104.5 | +4.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSYS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NNDM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 77.3%, EPS growth -211.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 10.02x
- Beta 1.74, current ratio 10.02x
- 77.3% revenue growth vs SSYS's -3.7%
XMTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +162.1% vs SSYS's -15.6%
Among these 5 stocks, MTLS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.96
- 315.1% 10Y total return vs XMTR's -10.2%
- Lower P/E (19.2x vs 29.9x)
- 41.6% margin vs NNDM's -286.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.3% revenue growth vs SSYS's -3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 29.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.6% margin vs NNDM's -286.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs XMTR's 1.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.1% vs SSYS's -15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs NNDM's -48.4%, ROIC 14.9% vs -15.2% |
SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTC leads in 2 of 6 categories
XMTR leads 1 • SSYS leads 0 • NNDM leads 0 • MTLS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 25.5x NNDM's $118M. PTC is the more profitable business, keeping 41.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNDM's -2.9%. On growth, NNDM holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $551M | $118M | $741M | $279M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$54M | -$21M | $29M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$338M | -$52M | $7M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$105M | -$11M | $9M | $928M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +34.4% | +39.3% | +57.1% | +84.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | -61.8% | -4.8% | +2.9% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | -2.9% | -7.0% | +2.7% | +41.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -89.2% | -1.5% | +3.3% | +31.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | +106.4% | +35.9% | +5.8% | +21.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.7% | +100.0% | +66.7% | +91.5% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MTLS and PTC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.3x trailing earnings, PTC trades at a 32% valuation discount to MTLS's 35.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTLS's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTC's 16.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $707M | $389M | $4.0B | $321M | $17.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $639M | $194M | $4.3B | $242M | $18.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.41x | -1.35x | -64.34x | 35.61x | 24.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 69.79x | 185.00x | 116.97x | 29.91x | 19.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.98x | 16.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.28x | 3.80x | 5.76x | 1.06x | 6.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 0.72x | 14.41x | 1.07x | 4.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 29.92x | 20.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTC delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-59 for NNDM. NNDM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTC scores 8/9 vs NNDM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.3% | -58.7% | -18.8% | +3.0% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | -48.4% | -7.3% | +1.8% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | -15.2% | -5.7% | +2.0% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | -12.6% | -7.5% | +1.6% | +19.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.02x | 1.26x | 0.26x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$68M | -$195M | $334M | -$68M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $205M | $15M | $134M | $184M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $9M | $349M | $66M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -45.71x | -20.58x | 1.80x | 24.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTC five years ago would be worth $11,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,031 for MTLS. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +162.1% total return vs SSYS's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 81.1% vs SSYS's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +18.6% | +25.1% | -0.2% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.6% | +16.4% | +162.1% | +3.8% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.9% | -30.2% | +493.8% | -38.6% | +13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -72.3% | -10.2% | -79.7% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.6% | -97.5% | -10.2% | -19.3% | +315.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.0% | -11.3% | +81.1% | -15.0% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XMTR and PTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XMTR's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs SSYS's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.74x | 1.94x | 1.29x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.81 | $2.32 | $82.11 | $6.80 | $219.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.34 | $1.31 | $29.60 | $4.78 | $130.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +79.7% | +95.6% | +80.0% | +67.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 59.6 | 68.8 | 62.4 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 818K | 2.0M | 840K | 83K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSYS as "Buy", XMTR as "Buy", MTLS as "Buy", PTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 83.8% upside for MTLS (target: $10) vs -18.1% for XMTR (target: $64).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | — | $64.33 | $10.00 | $194.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | — | 14 | 12 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.4% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
PTC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XMTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SSYS vs NNDM vs XMTR vs MTLS vs PTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). PTC Inc. (PTC) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC?
On trailing P/E, PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus Materialise N. V. at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, PTC Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Inc.
(PTC) delivered a total return of +12. 6%, compared to -79. 7% for Materialise N. V. (MTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTC returned +315. 1% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Xometry, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XMTR is approximately 102% more volatile than PTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Inc. grew EPS 94. 9% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC?
PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 8% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTC leads at 35. 9% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTC leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PTC Inc.
(PTC) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 185. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 165. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTLS: 83. 8% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SSYS or NNDM or XMTR or MTLS or PTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), +315. 1% 10Y return). Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTC: +315. 1%, XMTR: -10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSYS and NNDM and XMTR and MTLS and PTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (SSYS (Technology) and NNDM (Technology) and XMTR (Industrials) and MTLS (Technology) and PTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock; XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.