Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STAA vs ISRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
STAA vs ISRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $161.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $239M | $10.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-80M | $2.98B |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -33.3% | 30.5% |
| Forward P/E | 70.2x | 43.8x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $153M | $3.37B |
STAA vs ISRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAAR Surgical Comp… (STAA) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 234.6 | +134.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STAA vs ISRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.54
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 4.55x
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 4.55x
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs STAA's 273.7%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (43.8x vs 70.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs STAA's -33.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs ISRG's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs ISRG's -15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs STAA's -17.8%, ROIC 15.0% vs -13.2% |
STAA vs ISRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STAA vs ISRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 44.2x STAA's $239M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STAA's -33.6%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $239M | $10.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$71M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$80M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.3% | +30.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.6% | +28.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +26.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | +23.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.8% | +18.8% |
Valuation Metrics
STAA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $161.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $158.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.84x | 57.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.16x | 43.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.63x | 16.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 9.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-23 for STAA. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STAA's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs STAA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.2% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.8% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.2% | +16.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$115M | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $153M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,980 for STAA. Over the past 12 months, STAA leads with a +40.3% total return vs ISRG's -15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs STAA's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.3% | -15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | +49.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +58.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +273.7% | +554.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.1% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
STAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ISRG's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STAA currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs ISRG's 75.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.81 | $603.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.64 | $427.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STAA as "Hold" and ISRG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.3% upside for ISRG (target: $623) vs -15.9% for STAA (target: $23).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.95 | $622.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.4% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STAA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
STAA vs ISRG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STAA or ISRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) offers the better valuation at 57. 6x trailing P/E (43. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STAA or ISRG?
On forward P/E, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 43. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STAA or ISRG?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -80. 2% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus STAA's +273. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STAA or ISRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning ISRG is approximately 88% more volatile than STAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 11% for STAAR Surgical Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STAA or ISRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -295. 1% for STAAR Surgical Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STAA or ISRG?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -33. 6% for STAAR Surgical Company — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -19. 2% for STAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STAA leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STAA or ISRG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) trades at 43. 8x forward P/E versus 70. 2x for STAAR Surgical Company — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ISRG: 37. 3% to $622. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — STAA or ISRG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is STAA or ISRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +273. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAA: +273. 7%, ISRG: +554. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STAA and ISRG?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.