Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.11B | $2.09B | $4.25B | $7.95B | $11.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $550M | $713M | $2.45B | $6.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-547M | $63M | $206M | $717M | $-243M |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 99.2% | 70.8% | 86.0% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | 26.9% | 44.4% | 31.8% | -10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 12.5x | 14.8x | 9.0x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $383M | $480M | $368M | $2.69B | $10.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $242M | $277M | $586M | $1.98B |
STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) | 100 | 107.3 | +7.3% |
| Hamilton Lane Incor… (HLNE) | 100 | 137.7 | +37.7% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 435.4 | +335.4% |
| Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 136.6% 10Y total return vs HLNE's 464.7%
- 65.1% NII/revenue growth vs GCMG's 5.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs GCMG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs GCMG's 0.7%
GCMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 0.89 vs STEP's 1.73
HLNE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.7%, EPS growth 46.6%
AMG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.23 vs GCMG's 1.44
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 14.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 0.72
IVZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.67, yield 3.1%
- Beta 1.67, yield 3.1%, current ratio 43.01x
- 3.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs STEP's 2.0%
- +93.1% vs HLNE's -42.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.1% NII/revenue growth vs GCMG's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 14.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 0.72 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs GCMG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs STEP's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs STEP's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.1% vs HLNE's -42.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs GCMG's 0.7% |
STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMG leads 1 • STEP leads 1 • IVZ leads 1 • GCMG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IVZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 11.6x GCMG's $550M. HLNE is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STEP's -15.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $550M | $713M | $2.4B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$948M | $123M | $320M | $855M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$547M | $63M | $206M | $717M | -$243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $195M | $364M | $978M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +99.2% | +70.8% | +86.0% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | +26.9% | +44.4% | +31.8% | -10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +8.2% | +30.5% | +29.3% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +31.8% | +43.7% | +41.1% | +22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.6% | +4.0% | -56.8% | +149.1% | +34.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AMG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, AMG trades at a 51% valuation discount to GCMG's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.33x vs GCMG's 1.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $2.1B | $4.2B | $7.9B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $2.3B | $4.3B | $10.1B | $20.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.50x | 26.57x | 16.44x | 13.09x | -16.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.90x | 12.54x | 14.77x | 8.98x | 10.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.44x | 0.81x | 0.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.28x | 13.31x | 10.61x | 16.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.80x | 3.79x | 5.96x | 3.25x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.17x | 17.28x | 4.60x | 2.22x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.34x | 11.91x | 13.64x | 7.91x | 8.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLNE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCMG delivers a 107.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $108 in annual profit, vs $-10 for STEP. STEP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCMG's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs STEP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.8% | +107.6% | +15.6% | +16.0% | -1.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.4% | +8.9% | +9.5% | +8.0% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.7% | +22.1% | +21.2% | +8.1% | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | +24.3% | +26.2% | +8.6% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 3.77x | 0.40x | 0.61x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $93M | $238M | $91M | $2.1B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $242M | $277M | $586M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $383M | $480M | $368M | $2.7B | $10.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -126.38x | 13.83x | 25.57x | 9.69x | -6.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STEP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STEP five years ago would be worth $17,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,918 for GCMG. Over the past 12 months, IVZ leads with a +93.1% total return vs HLNE's -42.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STEP at 38.3% vs HLNE's 12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.2% | -0.2% | -34.5% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | -8.0% | -42.6% | +70.0% | +93.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.7% | +60.5% | +42.4% | +109.8% | +79.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.6% | -0.8% | +7.1% | +71.7% | +8.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.6% | +36.9% | +464.7% | +86.2% | +22.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.3% | +17.1% | +12.5% | +28.0% | +21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GCMG and IVZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GCMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEP's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IVZ currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs HLNE's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.89x | 1.25x | 1.14x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.80 | $13.22 | $179.19 | $334.78 | $29.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.58 | $9.30 | $86.47 | $172.54 | $14.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +84.4% | +49.6% | +88.9% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 65.2 | 37.3 | 61.3 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 538K | 843K | 345K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
IVZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STEP as "Buy", GCMG as "Buy", HLNE as "Buy", AMG as "Buy", IVZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 115.1% upside for GCMG (target: $24) vs 10.8% for IVZ (target: $30). For income investors, IVZ offers the higher dividend yield at 3.10% vs GCMG's 1.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.50 | $24.00 | $171.50 | $331.50 | $29.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.2% | +2.8% | +0.0% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | $0.13 | $2.51 | $0.03 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +6.0% | +8.9% | +15.6% |
HLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STEP vs GCMG vs HLNE vs AMG vs IVZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) is the stronger pick with 65. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ?
On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus GCM Grosvenor Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Hamilton Lane Incorporated's 0. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ?
Over the past 5 years, StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to -0. 8% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLNE returned +464. 7% versus IVZ's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCM Grosvenor Inc.
(GCMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus StepStone Group Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning STEP is approximately 94% more volatile than GCMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 4% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) is pulling ahead at 65. 1% versus 5. 1% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GCM Grosvenor Inc. grew EPS 1124% year-over-year, compared to -376. 9% for StepStone Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ?
Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
5% net margin versus -15. 3% for StepStone Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLNE leads at 44. 4% versus -21. 3% for STEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GCMG leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Hamilton Lane Incorporated's 0. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for StepStone Group Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GCMG: 115. 1% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ?
In this comparison, IVZ (3.
1% yield), HLNE (2. 8% yield), STEP (2. 0% yield), GCMG (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STEP or GCMG or HLNE or AMG or IVZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GCM Grosvenor Inc.
(GCMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 1. 2% yield). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GCMG: +36. 9%, IVZ: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STEP and GCMG and HLNE and AMG and IVZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STEP is a small-cap high-growth stock; GCMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. STEP, GCMG, HLNE, IVZ pay a dividend while AMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 32%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.