Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Software - Application
STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $122M | $4M | $2.00B | $7M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $14M | $1.79B | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $317K | $-27M | $114M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | -82.1% | 27.4% | 10.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -116.6% | 8.3% | -8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 74.0x | — | 16.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $9M | $90M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $10M | $293M | $2M |
STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Star Fashion Cultur… (STFS) | 100 | 6.5 | -93.5% |
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 49.2 | -50.8% |
| Innospec Inc. (IOSP) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 41.8 | -58.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STFS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GURE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.52 vs FTFT's 2.36
IOSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.1%
- 92.6% 10Y total return vs STFS's -92.3%
- Beta 0.71, yield 2.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Better valuation composite
FTFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
- 77.5% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.5% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs GURE's -195.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs FTFT's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -11.9% vs STFS's -80.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 11.2% vs -11.2% |
STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IOSP leads in 4 of 6 categories
STFS leads 0 • GURE leads 0 • FTFT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOSP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 467.5x FTFT's $4M. IOSP is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $14M | $1.8B | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249,029 | $1M | $181M | -$34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $316,927 | -$27M | $114M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$879,317 | -$498,990 | $77M | $56.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | -82.1% | +27.4% | +10.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -116.6% | +8.3% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -195.8% | +6.4% | -120.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -3.6% | +4.3% | +14767.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.8% | +2.5% | +2.8% | +110.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.7% | +98.1% | -6.9% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, IOSP trades at a 77% valuation discount to STFS's 74.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IOSP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STFS's 58.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $122M | $4M | $2.0B | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $122M | $2M | $1.8B | $6M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.02x | -0.06x | 17.25x | -0.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.24x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 58.66x | — | 8.76x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.60x | 0.47x | 1.13x | 1.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 36.89x | 0.03x | 1.51x | 0.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 114.38x | — | 22.78x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-19 for GURE. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STFS's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOSP scores 6/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | -19.2% | +8.5% | -16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | -16.6% | +6.3% | -11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +142.7% | -11.2% | +11.2% | -97.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | -11.6% | +11.0% | -117.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.06x | 0.07x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$1M | -$203M | -$457,223 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $10M | $293M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $9M | $90M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.18x | -268.95x | — | -228.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IOSP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IOSP five years ago would be worth $8,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $90 for FTFT. Over the past 12 months, IOSP leads with a -11.9% total return vs STFS's -80.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOSP at -4.7% vs STFS's -57.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +149.6% | -11.5% | +5.6% | +73.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.0% | -44.9% | -11.9% | -24.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -88.4% | -13.4% | -89.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -94.9% | -12.7% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -95.3% | +92.6% | -98.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.5% | -51.2% | -4.7% | -53.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IOSP currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs STFS's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.52x | 0.71x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $104.00 | $11.83 | $95.55 | $4.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $2.04 | $65.58 | $0.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.6% | +28.7% | +84.3% | +32.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 95.5 | 39.7 | 53.9 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 60K | 224K | 109K |
Analyst Outlook
IOSP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
IOSP is the only dividend payer here at 2.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $115.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.70 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IOSP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Innospec Inc. (IOSP) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innospec Inc. (IOSP) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?
On trailing P/E, Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited at 74. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?
Over the past 5 years, Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) delivered a total return of -12. 7%, compared to -99. 1% for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IOSP returned +92. 6% versus FTFT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning FTFT is approximately 355% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 24% for Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innospec Inc. grew EPS 228. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOSP leads at -3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?
Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited (STFS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
3% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STFS leads at 12. 9% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IOSP leads at 27. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?
In this comparison, IOSP (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. STFS, GURE, FTFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innospec Inc.
(IOSP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 2. 1% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IOSP: +92. 6%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STFS and GURE and IOSP and FTFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (STFS (Communication Services) and GURE (Basic Materials) and IOSP (Basic Materials) and FTFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock. IOSP pays a dividend while STFS, GURE, FTFT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.