Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STFS
Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$122M
5Y Perf.-93.5%
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-50.8%
IOSP
Innospec Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.-25.3%
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-58.2%

STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STFS logoSTFS
GURE logoGURE
IOSP logoIOSP
FTFT logoFTFT
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtySoftware - Application
Market Cap$122M$4M$2.00B$7M
Revenue (TTM)$21M$14M$1.79B$4M
Net Income (TTM)$317K$-27M$114M$-5M
Gross Margin8.3%-82.1%27.4%10.7%
Operating Margin1.5%-116.6%8.3%-8.9%
Forward P/E74.0x16.2x
Total Debt$5M$9M$90M$2M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$10M$293M$2M

STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STFS
GURE
IOSP
FTFT
StockOct 24May 26Return
Star Fashion Cultur… (STFS)1006.5-93.5%
Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE)10049.2-50.8%
Innospec Inc. (IOSP)10074.7-25.3%
Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT)10041.8-58.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IOSP leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Gulf Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. FTFT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
STFS
Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited
The Growth Angle

STFS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GURE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.52 vs FTFT's 2.36
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
The Income Pick

IOSP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.1%
  • 92.6% 10Y total return vs STFS's -92.3%
  • Beta 0.71, yield 2.1%, current ratio 2.79x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
The Growth Play

FTFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
  • 77.5% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFTFT logoFTFT77.5% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
ValueIOSP logoIOSPBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsIOSP logoIOSP6.4% margin vs GURE's -195.8%
Stability / SafetyGURE logoGUREBeta 0.52 vs FTFT's 2.36
DividendsIOSP logoIOSP2.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IOSP logoIOSP-11.9% vs STFS's -80.0%
Efficiency (ROA)IOSP logoIOSP6.3% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 11.2% vs -11.2%

STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

STFSStar Fashion Culture Holdings Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

GUREGulf Resources, Inc.
FY 2023
Natural Gas
100.0%$150,861
Corporate
0.0%$0
Crude Salt
0.0%$0
Chemical Products
0.0%$0
Segment Total
0.0%$0
Bromine
0.0%$0
IOSPInnospec Inc.
FY 2025
Fuel Specialties
39.5%$702M
Performance Chemicals
38.3%$681M
Oilfield Services
22.2%$395M
FTFTFuture FinTech Group Inc.
FY 2023
Other Segments
100.0%$1M

STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIOSPLAGGINGFTFT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IOSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

IOSP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 467.5x FTFT's $4M. IOSP is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%.

MetricSTFS logoSTFSStar Fashion Cult…GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…IOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$14M$1.8B$4M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$249,029$1M$181M-$34M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$316,927-$27M$114M-$5M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$879,317-$498,990$77M$56.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+8.3%-82.1%+27.4%+10.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.5%-116.6%+8.3%-8.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.5%-195.8%+6.4%-120.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.2%-3.6%+4.3%+14767.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.8%+2.5%+2.8%+110.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-120.7%+98.1%-6.9%+100.0%
IOSP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 17.2x trailing earnings, IOSP trades at a 77% valuation discount to STFS's 74.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IOSP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STFS's 58.7x.

MetricSTFS logoSTFSStar Fashion Cult…GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…IOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…
Market CapShares × price$122M$4M$2.0B$7M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$122M$2M$1.8B$6M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS74.02x-0.06x17.25x-0.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.54x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple58.66x8.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.60x0.47x1.13x1.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share36.89x0.03x1.51x0.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF114.38x22.78x
Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IOSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IOSP delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-19 for GURE. FTFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STFS's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOSP scores 6/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSTFS logoSTFSStar Fashion Cult…GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…IOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.5%-19.2%+8.5%-16.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%-16.6%+6.3%-11.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+142.7%-11.2%+11.2%-97.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.7%-11.6%+11.0%-117.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95265
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.24x0.06x0.07x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$1M-$203M-$457,223
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$10M$293M$2M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$9M$90M$2M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.18x-268.95x-228.78x
IOSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IOSP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IOSP five years ago would be worth $8,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $90 for FTFT. Over the past 12 months, IOSP leads with a -11.9% total return vs STFS's -80.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOSP at -4.7% vs STFS's -57.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTFS logoSTFSStar Fashion Cult…GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…IOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+149.6%-11.5%+5.6%+73.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-80.0%-44.9%-11.9%-24.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.3%-88.4%-13.4%-89.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.3%-94.9%-12.7%-99.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.3%-95.3%+92.6%-98.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-57.5%-51.2%-4.7%-53.3%
IOSP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IOSP currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs STFS's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTFS logoSTFSStar Fashion Cult…GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…IOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.52x0.71x2.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$104.00$11.83$95.55$4.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.11$2.04$65.58$0.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+9.6%+28.7%+84.3%+32.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10095.539.753.941.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded185K60K224K109K
Evenly matched — GURE and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IOSP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

IOSP is the only dividend payer here at 2.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSTFS logoSTFSStar Fashion Cult…GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…IOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.FTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$115.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts9
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.70
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
IOSP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IOSP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallInnospec Inc. (IOSP)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STFS vs GURE vs IOSP vs FTFT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.

(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Innospec Inc. (IOSP) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innospec Inc. (IOSP) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?

On trailing P/E, Innospec Inc.

(IOSP) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited at 74. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?

Over the past 5 years, Innospec Inc.

(IOSP) delivered a total return of -12. 7%, compared to -99. 1% for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IOSP returned +92. 6% versus FTFT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.

(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning FTFT is approximately 355% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 24% for Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.

(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innospec Inc. grew EPS 228. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOSP leads at -3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited (STFS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

3% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STFS leads at 12. 9% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IOSP leads at 27. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT?

In this comparison, IOSP (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. STFS, GURE, FTFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is STFS or GURE or IOSP or FTFT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Innospec Inc.

(IOSP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 2. 1% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IOSP: +92. 6%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between STFS and GURE and IOSP and FTFT?

These companies operate in different sectors (STFS (Communication Services) and GURE (Basic Materials) and IOSP (Basic Materials) and FTFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: STFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock. IOSP pays a dividend while STFS, GURE, FTFT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

STFS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GURE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 125%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IOSP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FTFT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 55%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform STFS and GURE and IOSP and FTFT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(STFS: 21.8% · GURE: 250.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.