Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STHO
Star Holdings

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$114M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
STRW
Strawberry Fields REIT LLC

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateAMEX • US
Market Cap$170M
5Y Perf.+90.4%
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$281M
5Y Perf.+16.7%
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.80B
5Y Perf.-5.2%

STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STHO logoSTHO
STRW logoSTRW
PINE logoPINE
FCPT logoFCPT
IndustryReal Estate - ServicesREIT - Healthcare FacilitiesREIT - RetailREIT - Retail
Market Cap$114M$170M$281M$2.80B
Revenue (TTM)$84M$145M$65M$301M
Net Income (TTM)$-148M$7M$-415K$117M
Gross Margin-22.9%81.4%-4.1%98.0%
Operating Margin-7.6%54.3%28.0%56.0%
Forward P/E19.4x59.3x21.8x
Total Debt$270M$672M$394M$1.21B
Cash & Equiv.$50M$48M$5M$12M

STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STHO
STRW
PINE
FCPT
StockMar 23May 26Return
Star Holdings (STHO)10050.8-49.2%
Strawberry Fields R… (STRW)100190.4+90.4%
Alpine Income Prope… (PINE)100116.7+16.7%
Four Corners Proper… (FCPT)10094.8-5.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FCPT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Star Holdings is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. STRW and PINE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
STHO
Star Holdings
The Real Estate Income Play

STHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 23.9% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7%
Best for: growth
STRW
Strawberry Fields REIT LLC
The Real Estate Income Play

STRW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 46.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
  • 47.8% 10Y total return vs FCPT's 99.1%
  • Lower P/E (19.4x vs 21.8x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +37.3% vs FCPT's -3.0%
Best for: momentum
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
  • Beta 0.14, yield 5.5%, current ratio 0.30x
  • 38.7% margin vs STHO's -175.8%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSTHO logoSTHO23.9% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7%
ValueSTRW logoSTRWLower P/E (19.4x vs 21.8x)
Quality / MarginsFCPT logoFCPT38.7% margin vs STHO's -175.8%
Stability / SafetyFCPT logoFCPTBeta 0.14 vs STHO's 1.06, lower leverage
DividendsFCPT logoFCPT5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs STRW's 4.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PINE logoPINE+37.3% vs FCPT's -3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FCPT logoFCPT4.1% ROA vs STHO's -24.8%, ROIC 4.5% vs 1.8%

STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

STHOStar Holdings
FY 2025
Other income
32.4%$52M
Real estate expense
31.1%$50M
Land development revenue
29.1%$46M
Operating lease income
4.6%$7M
Interest income
2.8%$5M
STRWStrawberry Fields REIT LLC

Segment breakdown not available.

PINEAlpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Income Properties
100.0%$49M
FCPTFour Corners Property Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate Operations
89.2%$262M
Restaurant Operations
10.7%$31M
Other
0.1%$400,000

STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSTRWLAGGINGPINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 4.6x PINE's $65M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STHO's -175.8%. On growth, STRW holds the edge at +34.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTHO logoSTHOStar HoldingsSTRW logoSTRWStrawberry Fields…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…FCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$84M$145M$65M$301M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$123M$45M$231M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$148M$7M-$415,000$117M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$77M$88M-$46M$188M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-22.9%+81.4%-4.1%+98.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.6%+54.3%+28.0%+56.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-175.8%+4.8%-0.6%+38.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-91.3%+60.7%-71.7%+62.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-23.6%+34.8%+29.6%+9.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-98.0%+6.7%+185.7%+7.7%
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 3% valuation discount to FCPT's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STRW's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STHO's 18.9x.

MetricSTHO logoSTHOStar HoldingsSTRW logoSTRWStrawberry Fields…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…FCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…
Market CapShares × price$114M$170M$281M$2.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$334M$793M$671M$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.80x22.72x-89.27x23.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.44x59.32x21.81x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate118.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.88x8.31x14.63x17.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.03x1.45x4.65x9.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.44x1.10x1.01x1.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.81x14.54x
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — STRW and FCPT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-50 for STHO. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSTHO logoSTHOStar HoldingsSTRW logoSTRWStrawberry Fields…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…FCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-50.3%+11.2%-0.1%+7.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-24.8%+0.8%-0.1%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.8%+7.2%+2.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+9.0%+2.8%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95727
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.02x8.04x1.31x0.74x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$220M$623M$390M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$50M$48M$5M$12M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$270M$672M$394M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x1.82x0.82x3.17x
Evenly matched — STRW and FCPT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in STRW five years ago would be worth $14,780 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,418 for STHO. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs FCPT's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRW at 27.9% vs STHO's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTHO logoSTHOStar HoldingsSTRW logoSTRWStrawberry Fields…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…FCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.8%+1.0%+18.8%+11.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+37.0%+29.7%+37.3%-3.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.8%+109.3%+46.6%+14.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.8%+47.8%+41.2%+17.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.8%+47.8%+38.3%+99.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.0%+27.9%+13.6%+4.5%
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — STHO and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STHO's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STHO currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FCPT's 90.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTHO logoSTHOStar HoldingsSTRW logoSTRWStrawberry Fields…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…FCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.06x0.69x0.33x0.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.25$14.00$20.80$28.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.06$9.46$13.10$22.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+92.5%+94.4%+90.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.051.654.055.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K23K176K658K
Evenly matched — STHO and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: STRW as "Buy", PINE as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs 5.7% for PINE (target: $21). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.49% vs PINE's 0.18%.

MetricSTHO logoSTHOStar HoldingsSTRW logoSTRWStrawberry Fields…PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…FCPT logoFCPTFour Corners Prop…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.33$20.75$27.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts21215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.4%+0.2%+5.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises208
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.57$0.04$1.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.0%+1.5%+3.1%0.0%
FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). STRW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallStrawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Star Holdings (STHO) is the stronger pick with 23.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?

On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.

7x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?

Over the past 5 years, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) delivered a total return of +47.

8%, compared to -55. 8% for Star Holdings (STHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus STHO's -55. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Star Holdings's 1. 06β — meaning STHO is approximately 645% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Star Holdings (STHO) is pulling ahead at 23.

9% versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strawberry Fields REIT LLC grew EPS 46. 2% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRW leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?

Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -58. 3% for Star Holdings — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus 11. 3% for STHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19.

4x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?

In this comparison, FCPT (5.

5% yield), STRW (4. 4% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. STHO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.

(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, STHO: -55. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between STHO and STRW and PINE and FCPT?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: STHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. STRW, FCPT pay a dividend while STHO, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

STHO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STRW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 48%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PINE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCPT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform STHO and STRW and PINE and FCPT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(STHO: -23.6% · STRW: 34.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.