Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $114M | $170M | $281M | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $145M | $65M | $301M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $7M | $-415K | $117M |
| Gross Margin | -22.9% | 81.4% | -4.1% | 98.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 54.3% | 28.0% | 56.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.4x | 59.3x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $270M | $672M | $394M | $1.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $48M | $5M | $12M |
STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Star Holdings (STHO) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Strawberry Fields R… (STRW) | 100 | 190.4 | +90.4% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 23.9% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7%
STRW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 46.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
- 47.8% 10Y total return vs FCPT's 99.1%
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 21.8x)
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.3% vs FCPT's -3.0%
FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
- Beta 0.14, yield 5.5%, current ratio 0.30x
- 38.7% margin vs STHO's -175.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 21.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs STHO's -175.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs STHO's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs STRW's 4.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs FCPT's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs STHO's -24.8%, ROIC 4.5% vs 1.8% |
STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
STRW leads 2 • STHO leads 0 • PINE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 4.6x PINE's $65M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STHO's -175.8%. On growth, STRW holds the edge at +34.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $145M | $65M | $301M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $123M | $45M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $7M | -$415,000 | $117M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | $88M | -$46M | $188M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -22.9% | +81.4% | -4.1% | +98.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +54.3% | +28.0% | +56.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -175.8% | +4.8% | -0.6% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -91.3% | +60.7% | -71.7% | +62.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.6% | +34.8% | +29.6% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.0% | +6.7% | +185.7% | +7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 3% valuation discount to FCPT's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STRW's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STHO's 18.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $170M | $281M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $334M | $793M | $671M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.80x | 22.72x | -89.27x | 23.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.44x | 59.32x | 21.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 118.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.88x | 8.31x | 14.63x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | 1.45x | 4.65x | 9.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 1.10x | 1.01x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.81x | — | 14.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STRW and FCPT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-50 for STHO. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.3% | +11.2% | -0.1% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.8% | +0.8% | -0.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +7.2% | +2.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.0% | +2.8% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 8.04x | 1.31x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $220M | $623M | $390M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $48M | $5M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $270M | $672M | $394M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 1.82x | 0.82x | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRW five years ago would be worth $14,780 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,418 for STHO. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs FCPT's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRW at 27.9% vs STHO's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +1.0% | +18.8% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.0% | +29.7% | +37.3% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.8% | +109.3% | +46.6% | +14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.8% | +47.8% | +41.2% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.8% | +47.8% | +38.3% | +99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.0% | +27.9% | +13.6% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STHO and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STHO's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STHO currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FCPT's 90.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.69x | 0.33x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $14.00 | $20.80 | $28.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.06 | $9.46 | $13.10 | $22.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +92.5% | +94.4% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 51.6 | 54.0 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 23K | 176K | 658K |
Analyst Outlook
FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRW as "Buy", PINE as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs 5.7% for PINE (target: $21). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.49% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.33 | $20.75 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.4% | +0.2% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.57 | $0.04 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +1.5% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). STRW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
STHO vs STRW vs PINE vs FCPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Star Holdings (STHO) is the stronger pick with 23.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?
On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?
Over the past 5 years, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) delivered a total return of +47.
8%, compared to -55. 8% for Star Holdings (STHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus STHO's -55. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Star Holdings's 1. 06β — meaning STHO is approximately 645% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Star Holdings (STHO) is pulling ahead at 23.
9% versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strawberry Fields REIT LLC grew EPS 46. 2% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRW leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -58. 3% for Star Holdings — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus 11. 3% for STHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT?
In this comparison, FCPT (5.
5% yield), STRW (4. 4% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. STHO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STHO or STRW or PINE or FCPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, STHO: -55. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STHO and STRW and PINE and FCPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. STRW, FCPT pay a dividend while STHO, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.