Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STKE vs SMLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
STKE vs SMLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $43M | $311M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $37M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -94.7% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $70K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $9M |
Quick Verdict: STKE vs SMLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 200.0%
SMLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 2.48
- 11.1% 10Y total return vs STKE's -81.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.48, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 3.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.6x) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.48 vs STKE's 3.61 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -38.5% vs STKE's -81.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs STKE's -2.6%, ROIC 13.3% vs 28.2% |
STKE vs SMLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMLR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMLR and STKE operate at a comparable scale, with $37M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $37M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -94.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +130.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +48.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SMLR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.0x trailing earnings, SMLR trades at a 40% valuation discount to STKE's 6.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STKE's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMLR's 14.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $311M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42M | $302M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.57x | 3.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.95x | 14.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STKE and SMLR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMLR delivers a 10.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for STKE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMLR scores 4/9 vs STKE's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.2% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.3% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $70,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | -12.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMLR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMLR five years ago would be worth $1,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,814 for STKE. Over the past 12 months, SMLR leads with a -38.5% total return vs STKE's -81.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMLR at -6.8% vs STKE's -43.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.5% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.9% | -38.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | -81.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +1110.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.4% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SMLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMLR is the less volatile stock with a 2.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STKE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMLR currently trades 40.3% from its 52-week high vs STKE's 11.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.61x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.64 | $50.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.85 | $14.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.3% | +40.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 255K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% |
SMLR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
STKE vs SMLR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKE or SMLR a better buy right now?
Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STKE or SMLR?
On trailing P/E, Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus Sol Strategies Inc. Common Shares at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STKE or SMLR?
Over the past 5 years, Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) delivered a total return of -81. 8%, compared to -81. 9% for Sol Strategies Inc. Common Shares (STKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMLR returned +1110% versus STKE's -81. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STKE or SMLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 48β versus Sol Strategies Inc. Common Shares's 3. 61β — meaning STKE is approximately 46% more volatile than SMLR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — STKE or SMLR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sol Strategies Inc.
Common Shares grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to 95. 1% for Semler Scientific, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STKE or SMLR?
Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sol Strategies Inc. Common Shares — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMLR leads at 37. 2% versus 0. 0% for STKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMLR leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — STKE or SMLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is STKE or SMLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1110% 10Y return). Sol Strategies Inc. Common Shares (STKE) carries a higher beta of 3. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMLR: +1110%, STKE: -81. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STKE and SMLR?
These companies operate in different sectors (STKE (Financial Services) and SMLR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.