Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $145K | $24.18B | $11.41B | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10K | $55.71B | $12.14B | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $453M | $489M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | -120.0% | 6.6% | 15.5% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | -66.9% | 2.3% | 6.0% | -82.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.5x | 14.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $8.83B | $2.86B | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.23B | $671M | $208M |
STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steakholder Foods L… (STKH) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 41.4% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
TSN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -39.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 23.1% 10Y total return vs HRL's -23.9%
- +26.8% vs STKH's -92.8%
HRL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 36.1%, current ratio 2.47x
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.5%, current ratio 2.47x
- Better valuation composite
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs STKH's -803.0%
- 39.3% ROA vs STKH's -137.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -131.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.4% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs STKH's -803.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs BYND's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs TSN's 2.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs STKH's -92.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs STKH's -137.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -131.2% |
STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRL leads in 3 of 6 categories
TSN leads 2 • STKH leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 5571000.0x STKH's $10,000. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STKH's -803.0%. On growth, TSN holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10,000 | $55.7B | $12.1B | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50,998 | $2.7B | $932M | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $453M | $489M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $1.2B | $578M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -120.0% | +6.6% | +15.5% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -66.9% | +2.3% | +6.0% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -803.0% | +0.8% | +4.0% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -761.1% | +2.2% | +4.8% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +1.3% | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.5% | +36.1% | +6.5% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TSN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.8x trailing earnings, HRL trades at a 52% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TSN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HRL's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145,339 | $24.2B | $11.4B | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $31.8B | $13.6B | $714M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 49.95x | 23.84x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.46x | 14.13x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.34x | 13.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.53x | 0.44x | 0.94x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 1.30x | 1.44x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.55x | 21.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRL delivers a 4.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-195 for STKH. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STKH's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -195.3% | +2.5% | +4.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -137.1% | +1.3% | +3.7% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -131.2% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.3% | +4.6% | +6.0% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.48x | 0.36x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $7.6B | $2.2B | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.2B | $671M | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $8.8B | $2.9B | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.78x | 2.73x | 6.44x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSN five years ago would be worth $9,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for STKH. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +26.8% total return vs STKH's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSN at 13.3% vs STKH's -82.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.3% | +17.9% | -8.8% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.8% | +26.8% | -24.7% | -64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +45.6% | -40.5% | -93.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -1.6% | -44.3% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +23.1% | -23.9% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.0% | +13.3% | -15.9% | -59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSN and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRL is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs STKH's 6.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 0.33x | 0.15x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.72 | $69.48 | $31.86 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.12 | $50.56 | $20.32 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.1% | +97.8% | +65.1% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 64.5 | 39.5 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 2.7M | 4.2M | 59.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HRL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TSN as "Buy", HRL as "Hold", BYND as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 3.4% for TSN (target: $70). For income investors, HRL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.54% vs TSN's 2.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $70.25 | $27.25 | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 | 29 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +5.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 34 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TSN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
STKH vs TSN vs HRL vs BYND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND?
On trailing P/E, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is the cheapest at 23.
8x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Hormel Foods Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) delivered a total return of -1. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Steakholder Foods Ltd. (STKH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSN returned +23. 1% versus STKH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
15β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 998% more volatile than HRL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 61% for Steakholder Foods Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Steakholder Foods Ltd. grew EPS 69. 7% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSN leads at 0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -852. 1% for Steakholder Foods Ltd. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRL leads at 5. 9% versus -847. 6% for STKH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRL leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) trades at 14.
1x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Tyson Foods, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND?
In this comparison, HRL (5.
5% yield), TSN (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. STKH, BYND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STKH or TSN or HRL or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
15), 5. 5% yield). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRL: -23. 9%, BYND: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STKH and TSN and HRL and BYND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STKH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TSN, HRL pay a dividend while STKH, BYND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.