Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STKS
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63M
5Y Perf.+9.0%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.70B
5Y Perf.+242.1%
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$692M
5Y Perf.-28.8%

STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STKS logoSTKS
TXRH logoTXRH
BLMN logoBLMN
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$63M$11.70B$692M
Revenue (TTM)$807M$6.06B$3.97B
Net Income (TTM)$-90M$415M$22M
Gross Margin13.7%18.7%70.2%
Operating Margin4.8%8.2%1.1%
Forward P/E28.1x9.2x
Total Debt$651M$1.89B$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$135M$59M

STKS vs TXRH vs BLMNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STKS
TXRH
BLMN
StockMay 20May 26Return
The ONE Group Hospi… (STKS)100109.0+9.0%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100342.1+242.1%
Bloomin' Brands, In… (BLMN)10071.2-28.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TXRH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
STKS
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
The Growth Play

STKS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -261.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.5%
  • 19.7% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1%
Best for: growth exposure
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Income Pick

TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.5%
  • 331.7% 10Y total return vs STKS's -19.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 0.50x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
The Value Play

BLMN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 28.1x)
  • +14.9% vs STKS's -43.2%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSTKS logoSTKS19.7% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1%
ValueBLMN logoBLMNLower P/E (9.2x vs 28.1x)
Quality / MarginsTXRH logoTXRH6.8% margin vs STKS's -11.1%
Stability / SafetyTXRH logoTXRHBeta 0.75 vs BLMN's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsTXRH logoTXRH1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BLMN's 5.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BLMN logoBLMN+14.9% vs STKS's -43.2%
Efficiency (ROA)TXRH logoTXRH12.2% ROA vs STKS's -10.1%, ROIC 14.5% vs 4.2%

STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

STKSThe ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
FY 2025
Deferred license revenue
100.0%$116,000
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M
BLMNBloomin' Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
98.2%$3.9B
Franchise and Other Revenue
1.8%$72M

STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTXRHLAGGINGBLMN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 7.5x STKS's $807M. TXRH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STKS's -11.1%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTKS logoSTKSThe ONE Group Hos…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …BLMN logoBLMNBloomin' Brands, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$807M$6.1B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$82M$709M$225M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$90M$415M$22M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$361M$69M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.7%+18.7%+70.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.8%+8.2%+1.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.1%+6.8%+0.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.2%+5.9%+1.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.8%+12.8%+1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.8%+10.0%+30.0%
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

STKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.1x trailing earnings, TXRH trades at a 77% valuation discount to BLMN's 128.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STKS's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXRH's 19.0x.

MetricSTKS logoSTKSThe ONE Group Hos…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …BLMN logoBLMNBloomin' Brands, …
Market CapShares × price$63M$11.7B$692M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$710M$13.4B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.49x29.08x128.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.11x9.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.42x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.17x18.96x10.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.08x1.99x0.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.56x7.96x2.05x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.19x7.15x
STKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TXRH delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-67 for STKS. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLMN's 9.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLMN scores 6/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSTKS logoSTKSThe ONE Group Hos…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …BLMN logoBLMNBloomin' Brands, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-67.0%+27.9%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-10.1%+12.2%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.2%+14.5%+4.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.5%+20.1%+6.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage5.84x1.27x9.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$647M$1.8B$3.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$135M$59M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$651M$1.9B$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x1.06x
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $18,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,155 for STKS. Over the past 12 months, BLMN leads with a +14.9% total return vs STKS's -43.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 19.7% vs STKS's -33.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTKS logoSTKSThe ONE Group Hos…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …BLMN logoBLMNBloomin' Brands, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.7%+4.0%+27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-43.2%+4.4%+14.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.6%+71.7%-56.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.4%+85.8%-63.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.0%+331.7%-35.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-33.5%+19.7%-24.0%
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMN's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXRH currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs STKS's 38.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTKS logoSTKSThe ONE Group Hos…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …BLMN logoBLMNBloomin' Brands, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.50x0.75x2.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.26$199.99$10.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.65$153.82$5.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+38.0%+88.7%+75.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.842.970.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded43K1.0M2.8M
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TXRH and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TXRH as "Hold", BLMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.4% upside for BLMN (target: $9) vs 6.2% for TXRH (target: $188). For income investors, BLMN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.53% vs TXRH's 1.53%.

MetricSTKS logoSTKSThe ONE Group Hos…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …BLMN logoBLMNBloomin' Brands, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$188.36$9.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts4328
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+5.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises050
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.71$0.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.8%+1.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — TXRH and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TXRH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallTexas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STKS or TXRH or BLMN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

(STKS) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) offers the better valuation at 29. 1x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) a "Hold" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STKS or TXRH or BLMN?

On trailing P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the cheapest at 29. 1x versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. at 128. 7x. On forward P/E, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STKS or TXRH or BLMN?

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to -78. 4% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +331. 7% versus BLMN's -35. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STKS or TXRH or BLMN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning BLMN is approximately 194% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 9% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STKS or TXRH or BLMN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.

(STKS) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bloomin' Brands, Inc. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -261. 6% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STKS leads at 36. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STKS or TXRH or BLMN?

Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -11. 4% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXRH leads at 8. 6% versus 4. 1% for BLMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXRH leads at 12. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is STKS or TXRH or BLMN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Bloomin' Brands, Inc.

(BLMN) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLMN: 12. 4% to $9. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — STKS or TXRH or BLMN?

In this comparison, BLMN (5.

5% yield), TXRH (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. STKS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is STKS or TXRH or BLMN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 5% yield, +331. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +331. 7%, STKS: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between STKS and TXRH and BLMN?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: STKS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BLMN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. TXRH, BLMN pay a dividend while STKS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

STKS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLMN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 42%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform STKS and TXRH and BLMN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(STKS: 0.8% · TXRH: 12.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.