Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $60M | $10.41B | $678M | $23.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $806M | $6.06B | $3.97B | $12.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-92M | $415M | $22M | $1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 18.7% | 70.2% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 8.2% | 1.1% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.0x | 9.5x | 18.4x |
| Total Debt | $651M | $1.89B | $3.07B | $6.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $135M | $59M | $240M |
STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The ONE Group Hospi… (STKS) | 100 | 104.1 | +4.1% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
| Bloomin' Brands, In… (BLMN) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
| Darden Restaurants,… (DRI) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -261.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.5%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1%
TXRH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs DRI's 261.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
- 1.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BLMN's 5.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 12.2% ROA vs STKS's -10.1%, ROIC 14.5% vs 4.2%
BLMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.4x)
- +13.6% vs STKS's -38.8%
DRI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.55, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.42x
- 8.7% margin vs STKS's -11.4%
- Beta 0.55 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.7% margin vs STKS's -11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BLMN's 5.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs STKS's -38.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs STKS's -10.1%, ROIC 14.5% vs 4.2% |
STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DRI leads in 2 of 6 categories
TXRH leads 2 • STKS leads 1 • BLMN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.8B annually — 15.8x STKS's $806M. DRI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STKS's -11.4%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $806M | $6.1B | $4.0B | $12.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $709M | $225M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$92M | $415M | $22M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $441M | $119M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +18.7% | +70.2% | +44.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +8.2% | +1.1% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +6.8% | +0.5% | +8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +7.3% | +3.0% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | +12.8% | +1.0% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -172.2% | +10.0% | +30.0% | -3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
STKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, DRI trades at a 83% valuation discount to BLMN's 126.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STKS's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXRH's 17.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $10.4B | $678M | $23.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $707M | $12.2B | $3.7B | $29.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | 25.89x | 125.99x | 22.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.05x | 9.53x | 18.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.13x | 17.15x | 10.83x | 15.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 1.77x | 0.17x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 7.09x | 2.01x | 10.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.44x | 7.00x | 22.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRI delivers a 50.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-59 for STKS. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLMN's 9.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLMN scores 6/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.0% | +37.4% | +5.9% | +50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.1% | +12.2% | +0.7% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +14.5% | +4.3% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +20.1% | +6.9% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.84x | 1.27x | 9.10x | 2.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $647M | $1.8B | $3.0B | $6.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $135M | $59M | $240M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $651M | $1.9B | $3.1B | $6.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.64x | — | 1.06x | 7.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,983 for STKS. Over the past 12 months, BLMN leads with a +13.6% total return vs STKS's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs STKS's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | -7.4% | +24.6% | +5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.8% | -6.2% | +13.6% | +1.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | +53.6% | -56.9% | +41.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +61.6% | -64.0% | +55.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | +288.0% | -36.8% | +261.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.5% | +15.4% | -24.5% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMN's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DRI currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs STKS's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 0.70x | 1.82x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.26 | $199.99 | $10.70 | $228.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $153.82 | $5.19 | $169.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.3% | +79.0% | +74.3% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 45.7 | 73.3 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 983K | 2.8M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXRH and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXRH as "Hold", BLMN as "Hold", DRI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for TXRH (target: $192) vs 6.9% for BLMN (target: $9). For income investors, BLMN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.65% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $191.64 | $8.50 | $225.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 | 28 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +5.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.71 | $0.45 | $5.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
DRI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TXRH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
STKS vs TXRH vs BLMN vs DRI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
(STKS) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI?
On trailing P/E, Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. at 126. 0x. On forward P/E, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -80. 2% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus BLMN's -36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning BLMN is approximately 232% more volatile than DRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 9% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
(STKS) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bloomin' Brands, Inc. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -261. 6% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STKS leads at 36. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI?
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -11. 4% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DRI leads at 11. 3% versus 4. 1% for BLMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DRI leads at 21. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
(BLMN) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXRH: 21. 3% to $191. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI?
In this comparison, BLMN (5.
6% yield), DRI (2. 8% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. STKS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STKS or TXRH or BLMN or DRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 2. 8% yield, +261. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRI: +261. 8%, STKS: -22. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STKS and TXRH and BLMN and DRI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STKS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BLMN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DRI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TXRH, BLMN, DRI pay a dividend while STKS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.