Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Asset Management - Income
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Asset Management - Income | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $51.51B | $263.52B | $748M | $41.45B | $55.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.40B | $18.44B | $10M | $6.06B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $145M | $5.37B | $41M | $574M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 33.8% | 57.3% | 97.2% | 37.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 35.3% | 93.9% | 10.8% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 48.9x | 38.3x | 75.7x | 36.1x | 65.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.13B | $15.39B | $26M | $3.47B | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.84B | $3.23B | $6M | $2.15B | $772M |
STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| STMicroelectronics … (STM) | 100 | 233.2 | +133.2% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 243.8 | +143.8% |
| Nuveen Select Tax-F… (NXP) | 100 | 94.1 | -5.9% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 641.4 | +541.4% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 214.5 | +114.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- 13.0% revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1%
NXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 5.01x
- 93.9% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
- Beta 0.10 vs STM's 2.05, lower leverage
ON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs STM's 9.9%
- Lower P/E (36.1x vs 65.7x)
- +174.7% vs NXP's +5.8%
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (36.1x vs 65.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 93.9% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs STM's 2.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +174.7% vs NXP's +5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8% |
STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ON leads in 2 of 6 categories
TXN leads 2 • NXP leads 1 • STM leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 1814.5x NXP's $10M. NXP is the more profitable business, keeping 93.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, STM holds the edge at +22.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $18.4B | $10M | $6.1B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $8.1B | -$21M | $1.2B | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $145M | $5.4B | $41M | $574M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $160M | $3.7B | $0 | $1.5B | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +57.3% | +97.2% | +37.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +35.3% | +93.9% | +10.8% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +29.1% | +93.9% | +9.5% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +20.2% | — | +24.0% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.8% | +18.6% | — | +4.7% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +32.0% | -118.4% | +93.0% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 53.1x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 85% valuation discount to ON's 364.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ON's 29.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STM's 126.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $51.5B | $263.5B | $748M | $41.5B | $55.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50.8B | $275.7B | $768M | $42.8B | $60.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 321.94x | 53.11x | 75.68x | 364.72x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 48.85x | 38.32x | — | 36.14x | 65.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 126.61x | 34.37x | — | 29.84x | 57.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 14.90x | 73.60x | 6.91x | 12.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.94x | 16.24x | 0.90x | 5.66x | 7.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 101.24x | — | 29.22x | 72.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. NXP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXN scores 7/9 vs NXP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +32.5% | +5.7% | +7.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +15.5% | +5.4% | +4.5% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +15.8% | +1.0% | +6.1% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +19.0% | +1.3% | +6.2% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.95x | 0.04x | 0.45x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$704M | $12.2B | -$6M | $1.3B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $3.2B | $6M | $2.1B | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $15.4B | $26M | $3.5B | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.71x | 12.06x | 1462.58x | 10.49x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ON five years ago would be worth $28,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,119 for NXP. Over the past 12 months, ON leads with a +174.7% total return vs NXP's +5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXN at 23.0% vs NXP's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +112.1% | +64.6% | +3.8% | +86.5% | +59.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +158.6% | +83.2% | +5.8% | +174.7% | +121.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.7% | +86.1% | +11.5% | +31.4% | +45.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +70.9% | +1.2% | +181.4% | +50.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +993.5% | +476.1% | +33.4% | +1024.0% | +375.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | +23.0% | +3.7% | +9.5% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STM and NXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXP is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 1.11x | 0.10x | 1.95x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.01 | $292.64 | $14.65 | $105.88 | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.11 | $152.73 | $13.73 | $37.19 | $46.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +98.9% | +98.2% | +99.9% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 86.7 | 77.1 | 47.3 | 79.6 | 79.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.7M | 6.7M | 146K | 9.0M | 8.8M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STM as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", NXP as "Hold", ON as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -0.8% upside for STM (target: $58) vs -41.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.89% vs STM's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.50 | $253.71 | — | $62.40 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 65 | 2 | 45 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.9% | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 22 | — | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $5.48 | — | — | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +0.2% |
ON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TXN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 53. 1x trailing P/E (38. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?
On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 53.
1x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 364. 7x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 36. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) delivered a total return of +181.
4%, compared to +1. 2% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1024% versus NXP's +33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus STMicroelectronics N. V. 's 2. 05β — meaning STM is approximately 1938% more volatile than NXP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Instruments Incorporated grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXN leads at -4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the more profitable company, earning 93.
9% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 93. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXP leads at 93. 9% versus 2. 7% for STM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXP leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 36.
1x forward P/E versus 65. 7x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STM: -0. 8% to $57. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), STM (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NXP, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10)). ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXP: +33. 4%, ON: +1024%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STM and TXN and NXP and ON and MCHP?
These companies operate in different sectors (STM (Technology) and TXN (Technology) and NXP (Financial Services) and ON (Technology) and MCHP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
STM, TXN, MCHP pay a dividend while NXP, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.