Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • NL
Market Cap$51.51B
5Y Perf.+133.2%
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$263.52B
5Y Perf.+143.8%
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Asset Management - Income

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$748M
5Y Perf.-5.9%
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$41.45B
5Y Perf.+541.4%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$55.72B
5Y Perf.+114.5%

STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STM logoSTM
TXN logoTXN
NXP logoNXP
ON logoON
MCHP logoMCHP
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsAsset Management - IncomeSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$51.51B$263.52B$748M$41.45B$55.72B
Revenue (TTM)$12.40B$18.44B$10M$6.06B$4.37B
Net Income (TTM)$145M$5.37B$41M$574M$-97M
Gross Margin33.8%57.3%97.2%37.2%51.6%
Operating Margin3.5%35.3%93.9%10.8%4.1%
Forward P/E48.9x38.3x75.7x36.1x65.7x
Total Debt$2.13B$15.39B$26M$3.47B$5.67B
Cash & Equiv.$2.84B$3.23B$6M$2.15B$772M

STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STM
TXN
NXP
ON
MCHP
StockMay 20May 26Return
STMicroelectronics … (STM)100233.2+133.2%
Texas Instruments I… (TXN)100243.8+143.8%
Nuveen Select Tax-F… (NXP)10094.1-5.9%
ON Semiconductor Co… (ON)100641.4+541.4%
Microchip Technolog… (MCHP)100214.5+114.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TXN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. ON also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
The Technology Pick

STM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
The Income Pick

TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
  • Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
  • 13.0% revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
The Banking Pick

NXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 5.01x
  • 93.9% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
  • Beta 0.10 vs STM's 2.05, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

ON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 10.2% 10Y total return vs STM's 9.9%
  • Lower P/E (36.1x vs 65.7x)
  • +174.7% vs NXP's +5.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTXN logoTXN13.0% revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1%
ValueON logoONLower P/E (36.1x vs 65.7x)
Quality / MarginsNXP logoNXP93.9% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
Stability / SafetyNXP logoNXPBeta 0.10 vs STM's 2.05, lower leverage
DividendsTXN logoTXN1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ON logoON+174.7% vs NXP's +5.8%
Efficiency (ROA)TXN logoTXN15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%

STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

STMSTMicroelectronics N.V.
FY 2025
Product
98.0%$11.8B
Service
1.6%$193M
Product and Service, Other
0.4%$46M
TXNTexas Instruments Incorporated
FY 2025
Analog
83.9%$14.0B
Embedded Processing
16.1%$2.7B
NXPNuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Segment breakdown not available.

ONON Semiconductor Corporation
FY 2025
Power Solutions Group
75.1%$2.8B
Intelligent Sensing Group
24.9%$928M
MCHPMicrochip Technology Incorporated
FY 2025
Semiconductor Products Member
97.0%$4.3B
Technology Licensing Member
3.0%$131M

STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTXNLAGGINGMCHP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 1814.5x NXP's $10M. NXP is the more profitable business, keeping 93.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, STM holds the edge at +22.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…NXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…ON logoONON Semiconductor …MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.4B$18.4B$10M$6.1B$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.3B$8.1B-$21M$1.2B$881M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$145M$5.4B$41M$574M-$97M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$160M$3.7B$0$1.5B$820M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.8%+57.3%+97.2%+37.2%+51.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.5%+35.3%+93.9%+10.8%+4.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%+29.1%+93.9%+9.5%-2.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.3%+20.2%+24.0%+18.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.8%+18.6%+4.7%+15.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.3%+32.0%-118.4%+93.0%+164.2%
NXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 53.1x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 85% valuation discount to ON's 364.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ON's 29.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STM's 126.6x.

MetricSTM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…NXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…ON logoONON Semiconductor …MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…
Market CapShares × price$51.5B$263.5B$748M$41.5B$55.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$50.8B$275.7B$768M$42.8B$60.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS321.94x53.11x75.68x364.72x-9999.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.48.85x38.32x36.14x65.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple126.61x34.37x29.84x57.93x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.35x14.90x73.60x6.91x12.66x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.94x16.24x0.90x5.66x7.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF101.24x29.22x72.17x
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. NXP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXN scores 7/9 vs NXP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSTM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…NXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…ON logoONON Semiconductor …MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.8%+32.5%+5.7%+7.4%-1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.6%+15.5%+5.4%+4.5%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.3%+15.8%+1.0%+6.1%+1.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%+19.0%+1.3%+6.2%+2.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967345
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.95x0.04x0.45x0.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$704M$12.2B-$6M$1.3B$4.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.8B$3.2B$6M$2.1B$772M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.1B$15.4B$26M$3.5B$5.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense28.71x12.06x1462.58x10.49x0.78x
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ON five years ago would be worth $28,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,119 for NXP. Over the past 12 months, ON leads with a +174.7% total return vs NXP's +5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXN at 23.0% vs NXP's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…NXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…ON logoONON Semiconductor …MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+112.1%+64.6%+3.8%+86.5%+59.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+158.6%+83.2%+5.8%+174.7%+121.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+37.7%+86.1%+11.5%+31.4%+45.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.6%+70.9%+1.2%+181.4%+50.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+993.5%+476.1%+33.4%+1024.0%+375.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+11.3%+23.0%+3.7%+9.5%+13.4%
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — STM and NXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NXP is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricSTM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…NXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…ON logoONON Semiconductor …MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.05x1.11x0.10x1.95x1.70x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.01$292.64$14.65$105.88$103.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.11$152.73$13.73$37.19$46.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.9%+98.9%+98.2%+99.9%+99.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10086.777.147.379.679.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.7M6.7M146K9.0M8.8M
Evenly matched — STM and NXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: STM as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", NXP as "Hold", ON as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -0.8% upside for STM (target: $58) vs -41.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.89% vs STM's 0.60%.

MetricSTM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…NXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…ON logoONON Semiconductor …MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.50$253.71$62.40$87.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts296524546
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.9%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises52205
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.35$5.48$1.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+0.6%0.0%+3.3%+0.2%
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TXN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallTexas Instruments Incorpora… (TXN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STM vs TXN vs NXP vs ON vs MCHP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger pick with 13.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 53. 1x trailing P/E (38. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?

On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 53.

1x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 364. 7x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 36. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?

Over the past 5 years, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) delivered a total return of +181.

4%, compared to +1. 2% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1024% versus NXP's +33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

10β versus STMicroelectronics N. V. 's 2. 05β — meaning STM is approximately 1938% more volatile than NXP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is pulling ahead at 13.

0% versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Instruments Incorporated grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXN leads at -4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the more profitable company, earning 93.

9% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 93. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXP leads at 93. 9% versus 2. 7% for STM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXP leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 36.

1x forward P/E versus 65. 7x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STM: -0. 8% to $57. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP?

In this comparison, TXN (1.

9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), STM (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NXP, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is STM or TXN or NXP or ON or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

10)). ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXP: +33. 4%, ON: +1024%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between STM and TXN and NXP and ON and MCHP?

These companies operate in different sectors (STM (Technology) and TXN (Technology) and NXP (Financial Services) and ON (Technology) and MCHP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

STM, TXN, MCHP pay a dividend while NXP, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

STM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXP

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCHP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform STM and TXN and NXP and ON and MCHP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(STM: 22.8% · TXN: 18.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(STM: 321.9x · TXN: 53.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.