STN vs J vs TTEK vs KBR vs SAIC

For growth investors, Stantec Inc.

(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). KBR, Inc. (KBR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, KBR, Inc.

(KBR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Jacobs Solutions Inc. at 48. 0x. On forward P/E, KBR, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Science Applications International Corporation wins at 0. 56x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. 's 2. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Stantec Inc.

(STN) delivered a total return of +95. 8%, compared to -20. 8% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTEK returned +416. 0% versus J's -19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Jacobs Solutions Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning J is approximately 295% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 2% for KBR, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.

(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KBR, Inc. grew EPS 14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -62. 3% for Jacobs Solutions Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

KBR, Inc.

(KBR) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus 2. 4% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 7. 1% for SAIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STN leads at 42. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. 's 2. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KBR, Inc. (KBR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Tetra Tech, Inc. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KBR: 61. 1% to $51. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

KBR, Inc. (KBR) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Stantec Inc. (STN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 0. 8% yield, +416. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +416. 0%, J: -19. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (STN (Industrials) and J (Industrials) and TTEK (Industrials) and KBR (Industrials) and SAIC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: STN is a small-cap high-growth stock; J is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KBR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SAIC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.