STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+50.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
STNG vs CLCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLCO
Cool Company Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$511M
5Y Perf.-19.8%
STNG vs CLCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | STNG | CLCO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $4.38B | $511M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $331M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $502M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 43.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $619M | $1.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $752M | $165M |
STNG vs CLCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
STNG
CLCO
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STNG vs CLCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: STNG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cool Company Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 62.8% 10Y total return vs CLCO's 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 12.1x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CLCO
Cool Company Ltd.
The Income Pick
CLCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 14.2%
- Rev growth -10.8%, EPS growth -44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- Beta 0.16, yield 14.2%, current ratio 0.73x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLCO | -10.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% |
| Value | STNG | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 12.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | STNG | 48.4% margin vs CLCO's 17.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CLCO | Beta 0.16 vs STNG's 0.28 |
| Dividends | STNG | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CLCO's 14.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | STNG | +115.3% vs CLCO's +62.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STNG | 12.6% ROA vs CLCO's 2.6%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.7% |
STNG vs CLCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
STNG vs CLCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSTNGLAGGINGCLCO
CLCOCool Company Ltd.
1leads
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CLCOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
STNG4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLCO4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
STNG8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
STNG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 3.1x CLCO's $331M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLCO's 17.8%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | CLCOCool Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $331M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $580M | $222M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $502M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | -$348M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.8% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +43.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +17.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | -105.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.2% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -100.0% |
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, CLCO trades at a 56% valuation discount to STNG's 12.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLCO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STNG's 8.7x.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | CLCOCool Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $511M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.05x | 5.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.58x | 12.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.68x | 7.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.67x | 1.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.92x | — |
CLCO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CLCO. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLCO's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs CLCO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | CLCOCool Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$133M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $752M | $165M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $619M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.82x | 1.36x |
STNG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STNG five years ago would be worth $45,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,188 for CLCO. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs CLCO's +62.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STNG at 24.4% vs CLCO's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | CLCOCool Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +71.3% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.3% | +62.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.7% | +6.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +359.0% | +1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.8% | +1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.4% | +2.0% |
STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STNG and CLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STNG's 0.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | CLCOCool Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.39 | $10.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.96 | $5.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 104K |
Evenly matched — STNG and CLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STNG and CLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STNG as "Buy" and CLCO as "Hold". For income investors, CLCO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.24% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | CLCOCool Company Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +14.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $1.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — STNG and CLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
STNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallScorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
STNG vs CLCO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STNG or CLCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the stronger pick with -10. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STNG or CLCO?
On trailing P/E, Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, Scorpio Tankers Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STNG or CLCO?
Over the past 5 years, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) delivered a total return of +359. 0%, compared to +1. 9% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STNG returned +62. 8% versus CLCO's +1. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STNG or CLCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 28β — meaning STNG is approximately 74% more volatile than CLCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 172% for Cool Company Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STNG or CLCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is pulling ahead at -10. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cool Company Ltd. grew EPS -44. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLCO leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STNG or CLCO?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 30. 4% for Cool Company Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLCO leads at 50. 5% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLCO leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STNG or CLCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Cool Company Ltd. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — STNG or CLCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is STNG or CLCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16), 14. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLCO: +1. 9%, STNG: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STNG and CLCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (STNG (Energy) and CLCO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(STNG: 46.2% · CLCO: 9.9%)Net Margin>
%
(STNG: 48.4% · CLCO: 17.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(STNG: 12.0x · CLCO: 5.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.