STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+377.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
STNG vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+297.6%
STNG vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | STNG | INSW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $4.38B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $676M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $502M | $546M |
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 44.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $619M | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $752M | $117M |
STNG vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
STNG
INSW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 477.4 | +377.4% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STNG vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: INSW leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Scorpio Tankers Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Income Pick
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Growth Play
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs STNG's 62.8%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INSW | -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% |
| Value | INSW | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 8.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | INSW | 80.8% margin vs STNG's 48.4% |
| Stability / Safety | STNG | Beta 0.28 vs INSW's 0.43, lower leverage |
| Dividends | INSW | 3.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | INSW | +160.2% vs STNG's +115.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INSW | 20.1% ROA vs STNG's 12.6%, ROIC 9.4% vs 7.2% |
STNG vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
STNG vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGSTNG
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.
1leads
INSWInternational Seaways…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs STNGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
STNG5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INSW5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
INSW6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.5x INSW's $676M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STNG's 48.4%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $676M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $580M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $502M | $546M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.8% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +44.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +80.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.2% | -91.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +4.8% |
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, STNG trades at a 17% valuation discount to INSW's 14.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STNG's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.5x.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.05x | 14.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.58x | 8.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.68x | 10.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.67x | 5.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.92x | 117.08x |
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $16 for STNG. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSW's 0.29x.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.6% | +20.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$133M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $752M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $619M | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.82x | 0.90x |
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45,904 for STNG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs STNG's +115.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs STNG's 24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +71.3% | +96.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.3% | +160.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.7% | +179.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +359.0% | +438.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.8% | +1014.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.4% | +40.9% |
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.39 | $91.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.96 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 597K |
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STNG as "Buy" and INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.8% upside for STNG (target: $85) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | STNGScorpio Tankers I… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.33 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). STNG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
STNG vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STNG or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STNG or INSW?
On trailing P/E, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STNG or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +438. 1%, compared to +359. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STNG or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 53% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 29% for International Seaways, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STNG or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Seaways, Inc. grew EPS -25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSW leads at -0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STNG or INSW?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 36. 7% for International Seaways, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STNG or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNG: 0. 8% to $85. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — STNG or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is STNG or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, STNG: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STNG and INSW?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(STNG: 46.2% · INSW: -91.3%)Net Margin>
%
(STNG: 48.4% · INSW: 80.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(STNG: 12.0x · INSW: 14.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.