Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $4.37B | $3.44B | $4.54B | $2.89B | $8.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $1.29B | $676M | $952M | $1.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $502M | $277M | $546M | $351M | $218M |
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 47.2% | 40.6% | 27.5% | 26.5% |
| Operating Margin | 38.8% | 26.6% | 44.4% | 27.5% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 6.2x | 7.8x | 6.1x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $619M | $1.23B | $576M | $55M | $3.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $752M | $272M | $117M | $831M | $414M |
STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 475.8 | +375.8% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 424.0 | +324.0% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 404.0 | +304.0% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 477.7 | +377.7% |
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 432.7 | +332.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.22, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.22 vs TRMD's 0.52, lower leverage
TRMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 16.2%
- 16.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.3% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.3%
- 80.8% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
- +162.3% vs TNK's +93.6%
- 20.1% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.4% vs 10.6%
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs TRMD's 0.27
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 7.8x)
FRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 7.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs FRO's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs TRMD's 0.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.3% vs TNK's +93.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.4% vs 10.6% |
STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories
TNK leads 1 • INSW leads 1 • STNG leads 0 • FRO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STNG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.6x INSW's $676M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.3B | $676M | $952M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $580M | $555M | $465M | $348M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $502M | $277M | $546M | $351M | $218M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $242M | $122M | $113M | $557M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.8% | +47.2% | +40.6% | +27.5% | +26.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +26.6% | +44.4% | +27.5% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +21.4% | +80.8% | +36.9% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +18.7% | +18.0% | +11.8% | +31.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.2% | -7.8% | -91.3% | -26.4% | -11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -43.0% | +4.8% | +46.0% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 70% valuation discount to FRO's 17.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs FRO's 0.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B | $2.9B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $4.4B | $5.0B | $2.1B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.01x | 5.33x | 14.71x | 8.22x | 17.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.65x | 6.24x | 7.81x | 6.13x | 6.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.36x | 0.23x | — | 0.26x | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.65x | 5.16x | 10.63x | 7.00x | 10.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.66x | 2.20x | 5.38x | 3.03x | 4.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.57x | 2.25x | 1.41x | 3.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.89x | 14.74x | 118.95x | 25.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +12.9% | +27.1% | +17.2% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.6% | +8.7% | +20.1% | +15.7% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +18.0% | +9.4% | +12.5% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +22.8% | +12.1% | +10.9% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.59x | 0.29x | 0.03x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$133M | $954M | $459M | -$776M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $752M | $272M | $117M | $831M | $414M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $619M | $1.2B | $576M | $55M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.82x | 4.61x | 0.90x | 109.95x | 1.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $62,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45,005 for STNG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +162.3% total return vs TNK's +93.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 46.3% vs TRMD's 17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.8% | +74.9% | +99.6% | +61.7% | +97.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +111.6% | +122.3% | +162.3% | +93.6% | +141.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.1% | +60.1% | +183.5% | +141.2% | +213.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +350.1% | +418.0% | +450.0% | +526.1% | +477.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.3% | +596.2% | +1029.1% | +193.3% | +531.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.3% | +17.0% | +41.5% | +34.1% | +46.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STNG and FRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.52x | 0.41x | 0.36x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.39 | $34.88 | $92.66 | $83.99 | $39.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.96 | $15.79 | $35.60 | $41.05 | $16.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +97.3% | +98.9% | +98.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 63.2 | 73.0 | 61.6 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 912K | 594K | 525K | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STNG as "Buy", TRMD as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -5.4% for INSW (target: $87). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.17% vs STNG's 2.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $86.33 | $35.00 | $86.67 | $90.00 | $38.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 3 | 13 | 23 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +16.2% | +3.2% | +2.4% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $5.48 | $2.92 | $1.98 | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TNK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
STNG vs TRMD vs INSW vs TNK vs FRO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
3x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +526. 1%, compared to +350. 1% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1029% versus STNG's +62. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus TORM plc's 0. 52β — meaning TRMD is approximately 135% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for International Seaways, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 8. 4% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is STNG or TRMD or INSW or TNK or FRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 3. 2% yield, +1029% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1029%, TNK: +193. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STNG and TRMD and INSW and TNK and FRO?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.