Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STRA vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
STRA vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.79B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.27B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 37.4% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $109M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $141M | $10.73B |
STRA vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRA vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 16.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 1.27x
- PEG 1.45 vs WMT's 4.06
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs STRA's 114.7%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs STRA's 4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs STRA's 4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 44.7x), PEG 1.45 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs STRA's 0.48 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.0% vs STRA's -7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs STRA's 6.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 9.0% |
STRA vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STRA vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 553.3x STRA's $1.3B. STRA is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $216M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $174M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
STRA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, STRA trades at a 70% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.93x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.50x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.93x | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.93x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.17x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.60x | 24.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STRA and WMT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $8 for STRA. STRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$32M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $141M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,955 for STRA. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs STRA's -7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs STRA's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.8% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.5% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.7% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRA's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs STRA's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $93.45 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.70 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 317K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRA and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STRA as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for STRA (target: $87) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.00 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.52 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +0.8% |
STRA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
STRA vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRA or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRA or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Strategic Education, Inc.
(STRA) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Strategic Education, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 45x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRA or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to +19. 5% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus STRA's +114. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRA or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Strategic Education, Inc. 's 0. 48β — meaning STRA is approximately 315% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRA or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 4. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strategic Education, Inc. grew EPS 16. 1% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRA leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRA or WMT?
Strategic Education, Inc.
(STRA) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 0% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRA leads at 15. 5% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRA leads at 49. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRA or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 45x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 33. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRA: 10. 7% to $87. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRA or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is STRA or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, STRA: +114. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRA and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.