Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STRC vs CLSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
STRC vs CLSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $33.39B | $3.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12.36B | $-261M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | 94.2% | -26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 3.4x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $8.28B | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.30B | $43M |
Quick Verdict: STRC vs CLSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 1.3%
- 21.9% 10Y total return vs CLSK's -84.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
CLSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs STRC's 3.0%
- -33.2% margin vs STRC's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs STRC's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.4x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -33.2% margin vs STRC's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs CLSK's 3.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CLSK's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.6% vs STRC's +21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.5% ROA vs STRC's -19.4%, ROIC 10.3% vs -9.9% |
STRC vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STRC vs CLSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 1.6x STRC's $490M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.2% (CLSK) to -25.2% (STRC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $480M | $181M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12.4B | -$261M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.6B | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +41.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | -26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -133.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -132.0% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
STRC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.4B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.4B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.57x | 12.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.39x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.96x | 4.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLSK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLSK delivers a -13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-24 for STRC. STRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLSK's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs STRC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.1% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | -8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.9% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.6% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.0B | $781M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.3B | $824M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | -18.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRC five years ago would be worth $12,192 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,823 for CLSK. Over the past 12 months, CLSK leads with a +63.6% total return vs STRC's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 49.6% vs STRC's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +22.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.9% | +63.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +234.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | -11.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | -84.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +49.6% |
Risk & Volatility
STRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSK's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRC currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CLSK's 60.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 3.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.42 | $23.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.00 | $8.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +60.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRC and CLSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STRC as "Hold" and CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 152.0% upside for STRC (target: $252) vs 36.8% for CLSK (target: $19). For income investors, STRC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs CLSK's 0.24%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $252.00 | $19.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
STRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLSK leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
STRC vs CLSK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRC or CLSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STRC or CLSK?
Over the past 5 years, MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) delivered a total return of +21.
9%, compared to -11. 8% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRC returned +21. 9% versus CLSK's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STRC or CLSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning CLSK is approximately 861% more volatile than STRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 38% for CleanSpark, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STRC or CLSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 3. 0% for MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -151. 3% for MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STRC or CLSK?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -1140. 8% for STRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRC leads at 68. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STRC or CLSK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRC: 152.
0% to $252. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — STRC or CLSK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 2% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK).
08Is STRC or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 1. 3% yield). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRC: +21. 9%, CLSK: -84. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STRC and CLSK?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock. STRC pays a dividend while CLSK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.