Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STRR vs BBDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
STRR vs BBDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $30M | $963M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114M | $249M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $102M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 85.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $67M |
STRR vs BBDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Star Equity Holding… (STRR) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) | 100 | 118.6 | +18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRR vs BBDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 53.8% 10Y total return vs BBDC's 20.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 3.58x
- Beta 0.19 vs BBDC's 0.56, lower leverage
BBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 12.9%
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth -6.7%
- Beta 0.56, yield 12.9%, current ratio 3.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs STRR's -66.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.0% margin vs STRR's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs BBDC's 0.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs STRR's 6.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.4% vs STRR's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs STRR's -8.7%, ROIC 6.1% vs -24.3% |
STRR vs BBDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STRR vs BBDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBDC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $249M annually — 2.2x STRR's $114M. BBDC is the more profitable business, keeping 41.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRR's -5.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114M | $249M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $149M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $102M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $250M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +85.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +41.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +64.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.2% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
STRR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $963M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.37x | 9.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 3.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBDC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBDC delivers a 8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-13 for STRR. STRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBDC's 1.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBDC scores 6/9 vs STRR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.0% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.3% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.5% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -47.19x | 1.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBDC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBDC five years ago would be worth $13,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,171 for STRR. Over the past 12 months, BBDC leads with a +20.4% total return vs STRR's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBDC at 20.2% vs STRR's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.5% | +20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | +73.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.3% | +37.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.8% | +20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STRR and BBDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBDC's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBDC currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs STRR's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.99 | $9.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.99 | $7.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 695K |
Analyst Outlook
BBDC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BBDC offers the higher dividend yield at 12.95% vs STRR's 6.90%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.9% | +12.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.7% |
BBDC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STRR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STRR vs BBDC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRR or BBDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Barings BDC, Inc.
(BBDC) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -66. 9% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR). Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STRR or BBDC?
Over the past 5 years, Barings BDC, Inc.
(BBDC) delivered a total return of +37. 0%, compared to -48. 3% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRR returned +53. 8% versus BBDC's +20. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STRR or BBDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Equity Holdings, Inc.
(STRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Barings BDC, Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning BBDC is approximately 194% more volatile than STRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 123% for Barings BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STRR or BBDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Barings BDC, Inc.
(BBDC) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -66. 9% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Barings BDC, Inc. grew EPS -6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -257. 7% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STRR or BBDC?
Barings BDC, Inc.
(BBDC) is the more profitable company, earning 41. 0% net margin versus -19. 6% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBDC leads at 85. 2% versus -15. 8% for STRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BBDC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — STRR or BBDC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) offers the highest yield at 12. 9%, versus 6. 9% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR).
07Is STRR or BBDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Equity Holdings, Inc.
(STRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 6. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRR: +53. 8%, BBDC: +20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between STRR and BBDC?
These companies operate in different sectors (STRR (Healthcare) and BBDC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STRR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.