Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STSS vs SRTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
STSS vs SRTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $8K | $68M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $223K | $27M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-723K | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -40.9% | -37.5% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $680K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $864K | $22M |
STSS vs SRTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharps Technology, … (STSS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Sensus Healthcare, … (SRTS) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STSS vs SRTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and efficiency.
- 99.1% revenue growth vs SRTS's -34.3%
- -4.2% ROA vs SRTS's -13.4%, ROIC -120.0% vs -25.3%
SRTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.93
- Rev growth -34.3%, EPS growth -214.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.9%
- -29.7% 10Y total return vs STSS's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.1% revenue growth vs SRTS's -34.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -28.1% margin vs STSS's -324.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs STSS's 2.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.6% vs STSS's -59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.2% ROA vs SRTS's -13.4%, ROIC -120.0% vs -25.3% |
STSS vs SRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STSS vs SRTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $27M annually — 123.4x STSS's $222,722. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -28.1% (SRTS) to -3.2% (STSS).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $222,722 | $27M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$723,347 | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $449,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.9% | -37.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -28.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.2% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -62.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +111.0% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STSS and SRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7,830 | $68M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $46M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -8.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 203.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SRTS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STSS delivers a -5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-15 for SRTS. SRTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STSS's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRTS scores 4/9 vs STSS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | -15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | -13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -120.0% | -25.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -153.7% | -19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $864,041 | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $680,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SRTS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SRTS five years ago would be worth $12,088 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for STSS. Over the past 12 months, SRTS leads with a -2.6% total return vs STSS's -59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SRTS at 11.3% vs STSS's -92.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.5% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.9% | -2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +37.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +20.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -29.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.9% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STSS's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRTS currently trades 69.4% from its 52-week high vs STSS's 10.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.56x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.23 | $5.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.42 | $3.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.3% | +69.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 327K | 54K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
SRTS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
STSS vs SRTS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — STSS or SRTS?
Over the past 5 years, Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
(SRTS) delivered a total return of +20. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Sharps Technology, Inc. (STSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SRTS returned -29. 7% versus STSS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — STSS or SRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
(SRTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Sharps Technology, Inc. 's 2. 56β — meaning STSS is approximately 173% more volatile than SRTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 189% for Sharps Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — STSS or SRTS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
grew EPS -214. 6% year-over-year, compared to -782. 0% for Sharps Technology, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — STSS or SRTS?
Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
(SRTS) is the more profitable company, earning -28. 1% net margin versus -324. 8% for Sharps Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps -28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRTS leads at -37. 5% versus -40. 9% for STSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRTS leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — STSS or SRTS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is STSS or SRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
(SRTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93)). Sharps Technology, Inc. (STSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRTS: -29. 7%, STSS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between STSS and SRTS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.