Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
STUB logo
STUB
OPEN logo
OPEN
LYV logo
LYV
COMP logo
COMP
MSGE logo
MSGE
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STUB
StubHub Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.02B
5Y Perf.-12.2%
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.40B
5Y Perf.-78.1%
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$40.09B
5Y Perf.+110.7%
COMP
Compass, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.22B
5Y Perf.-54.8%
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.48B
5Y Perf.-18.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+108.5%

STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STUB logoSTUB
OPEN logoOPEN
LYV logoLYV
COMP logoCOMP
MSGE logoMSGE
JPM logoJPM
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationReal Estate - ServicesEntertainmentSoftware - ApplicationEntertainmentBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$4.02B$3.40B$40.09B$5.22B$3.48B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$1.79B$3.94B$25.61B$8.31B$1.02B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.84B$-1.39B$84M$14M$49M$57.05B
Gross Margin81.2%7.9%40.3%10.8%45.5%60.0%
Operating Margin-71.7%-9.9%3.4%-4.2%14.6%25.9%
Forward P/E22.8x26.8x65.4x14.4x
Total Debt$1.51B$193M$12.44B$454M$1.20B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$1.24B$962M$7.11B$199M$43M$343.34B

STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STUB
OPEN
LYV
COMP
MSGE
JPM
StockApr 21Jun 26Return
Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN)10021.9-78.1%
Live Nation Enterta… (LYV)100210.7+110.7%
Compass, Inc. (COMP)10045.2-54.8%
Madison Square Gard… (MSGE)10081.1-18.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100208.5+108.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Opendoor Technologies Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LYV, COMP, and MSGE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
STUB
StubHub Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick

STUB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OPEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +6.4% vs STUB's -47.9%
Best for: momentum
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
The Income Pick

LYV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.83
  • 6.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.00x
  • Beta 0.83, current ratio 1.00x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
COMP
Compass, Inc.
The Growth Play

COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
  • 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
Best for: growth exposure
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
The Niche Pick

MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 2.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 9.3% vs -15.8%
Best for: efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 65.4x)
  • 20.4% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOMP logoCOMP23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 65.4x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
Stability / SafetyLYV logoLYVBeta 0.83 vs OPEN's 3.12
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OPEN logoOPEN+6.4% vs STUB's -47.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MSGE logoMSGE2.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 9.3% vs -15.8%

STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

STUBStubHub Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LYVLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Concerts
63.3%$3.3B
Sponsorship and Advertising
32.7%$1.7B
Ticketing
4.0%$205M
COMPCompass, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
FY 2025
Entertainment
45.2%$712M
Ticketing And Venue License Fee Revenues
28.8%$453M
Sponsorship and Signage, Suite And Advertising Commission Revenues
16.0%$253M
Food, Beverage And Merchandise Revenues
9.6%$151M
Product and Service, Other
0.4%$6M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGMSGE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 275.2x MSGE's $1.0B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STUB's -102.3%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$3.9B$25.6B$8.3B$1.0B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1.3B-$363M$1.6B-$100M$206M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.8B-$1.4B$84M$14M$49M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$322M$1.1B$1.2B$16M$327M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.2%+7.9%+40.3%+10.8%+45.5%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-71.7%-9.9%+3.4%-4.2%+14.6%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-102.3%-35.2%+0.3%+0.2%+4.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+27.2%+4.8%+0.2%+32.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.2%-37.6%+12.1%+99.4%+1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+189.2%-50.0%-4.8%+133.3%0.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 83% valuation discount to MSGE's 95.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 65.7x.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$4.0B$3.4B$40.1B$5.2B$3.5B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.3B$2.6B$45.4B$5.5B$4.6B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.99x-2.61x-718.79x-85.90x95.44x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.83x26.84x65.39x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.54x65.69x24.12x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.30x0.78x1.59x0.75x3.69x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.04x3.39x21.99x6.24x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.02x3.28x120.16x25.70x37.35x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — OPEN and LYV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. OPEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-94.3%-163.2%+4.4%+1.1%+8.9%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-34.4%-53.6%+0.4%+0.4%+2.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.1%-15.8%+19.7%-2.5%+9.3%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-32.9%-11.7%+13.4%-2.9%+12.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9455465
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.19x6.84x0.58x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$265M-$769M$5.3B$255M$1.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.2B$962M$7.1B$199M$43M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$193M$12.4B$454M$1.2B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.89x-8.92x3.68x-0.12x3.03x0.74x
Evenly matched — OPEN and LYV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

COMP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,577 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +638.3% total return vs STUB's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 33.9% vs STUB's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.8%-26.9%+18.7%-18.2%+35.2%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-47.9%+638.3%+22.1%+34.0%+99.5%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%+69.5%+101.4%+139.9%+100.7%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%-74.2%+99.7%-37.9%-18.4%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%-58.9%+640.7%-57.4%-17.0%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.5%+19.2%+26.3%+33.9%+26.1%+33.6%
COMP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LYV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LYV is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 40.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.77x3.12x0.83x2.14x0.89x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.89$10.87$175.25$13.96$74.94$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.74$0.51$125.34$5.87$35.31$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.1%+40.8%+98.4%+61.6%+98.1%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.343.462.654.675.059.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.9M35.2M2.3M12.2M337K7.0M
LYV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: STUB as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold", LYV as "Buy", COMP as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.7% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs -8.1% for MSGE (target: $68). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.13$6.17$185.75$14.06$67.57$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts92644101361
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%+1.1%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COMP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STUB vs OPEN vs LYV vs COMP vs MSGE vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 95. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -74. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +640. 7% versus OPEN's -58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

(LYV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning OPEN is approximately 276% more volatile than LYV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STUB leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -109. 2% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -73. 4% for STUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STUB leads at 80. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 7% to $14. 06.

08

Which pays a better dividend — STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. STUB, OPEN, LYV, COMP, MSGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is STUB or OPEN or LYV or COMP or MSGE or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, OPEN: -58. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between STUB and OPEN and LYV and COMP and MSGE and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (STUB (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and LYV (Communication Services) and COMP (Technology) and MSGE (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: STUB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while STUB, OPEN, LYV, COMP, MSGE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.