REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STWD vs MS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
STWD vs MS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $6.93B | $307.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.89B | $103.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $412M | $16.18B |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 55.6% |
| Operating Margin | 51.6% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $22.20B | $360.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $499M | $75.74B |
STWD vs MS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starwood Property T… (STWD) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 100 | 437.3 | +337.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STWD vs MS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STWD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.45
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, current ratio 0.36x
- Beta 0.45, current ratio 0.36x
MS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.8%, EPS growth 53.5%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs STWD's 90.8%
- PEG 1.83 vs STWD's 10.06
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.8% NII/revenue growth vs STWD's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs MS's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs MS's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.7% vs STWD's +6.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs STWD's 0.7%, ROIC 2.9% vs 4.8% |
STWD vs MS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STWD vs MS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STWD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MS is the larger business by revenue, generating $103.1B annually — 54.6x STWD's $1.9B. STWD is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MS's 13.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $103.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $26.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $412M | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $957M | -$6.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.2% | +55.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +50.6% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.3% | +48.9% |
Valuation Metrics
STWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, STWD trades at a 38% valuation discount to MS's 24.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MS offers better value at 2.73x vs STWD's 14.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $307.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.6B | $592.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.02x | 24.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.20x | 16.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 14.82x | 2.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.94x | 26.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.69x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STWD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MS delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $5 for STWD. STWD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MS's 3.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STWD scores 6/9 vs MS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.96x | 3.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.7B | $284.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $499M | $75.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.2B | $360.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MS five years ago would be worth $24,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,132 for STWD. Over the past 12 months, MS leads with a +66.7% total return vs STWD's +6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MS at 34.3% vs STWD's 12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | +7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.5% | +66.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.7% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +142.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.8% | +739.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.9% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STWD and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STWD is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MS's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs STWD's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.05 | $194.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.90 | $117.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STWD as "Buy" and MS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for MS (target: $206) vs 3.7% for STWD (target: $19). MS is the only dividend payer here at 1.97% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $205.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
STWD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
STWD vs MS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STWD or MS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger pick with 16.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD). Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STWD or MS?
On trailing P/E, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Morgan Stanley at 24. 3x. On forward P/E, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Morgan Stanley wins at 1. 83x versus Starwood Property Trust, Inc. 's 10. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STWD or MS?
Over the past 5 years, Morgan Stanley (MS) delivered a total return of +142.
2%, compared to +11. 3% for Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +739. 4% versus STWD's +90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STWD or MS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 37β — meaning MS is approximately 202% more volatile than STWD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Morgan Stanley — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STWD or MS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Morgan Stanley (MS) is pulling ahead at 16.
8% versus -7. 9% for Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Morgan Stanley grew EPS 53. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 9% for Starwood Property Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STWD or MS?
Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 13. 0% for Morgan Stanley — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STWD leads at 76. 2% versus 17. 1% for MS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STWD leads at 80. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STWD or MS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 83x versus Starwood Property Trust, Inc. 's 10. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Morgan Stanley — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MS: 6. 5% to $205. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — STWD or MS?
In this comparison, MS (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. STWD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STWD or MS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.
0% yield, +739. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MS: +739. 4%, STWD: +90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STWD and MS?
These companies operate in different sectors (STWD (Real Estate) and MS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; MS is a large-cap high-growth stock. MS pays a dividend while STWD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.