STZ vs WMT

For growth investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 47. 6x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Constellation Brands, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 12. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -29. 4% for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus STZ's +15. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Constellation Brands, Inc. 's 0. 26β — meaning STZ is approximately 124% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 2. 5% for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -104. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -0. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STZ leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Constellation Brands, Inc.

(STZ) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 31. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STZ: 15. 4% to $175. 70.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, STZ: +15. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.