SUN
Sunoco LP
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$9.13B
5Y Perf.+159.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SUN vs GLP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GLP
Global Partners LP
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.+369.0%
SUN vs GLP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SUN | GLP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $9.13B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.20B | $18.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $396M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 8.9% | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $16.11B | $1.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $891M | $12M |
SUN vs GLP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SUN
GLP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunoco LP (SUN) | 100 | 259.3 | +159.3% |
| Global Partners LP (GLP) | 100 | 469.0 | +369.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUN vs GLP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SUN leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Global Partners LP is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SUN
Sunoco LP
The Income Pick
SUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 7.2%
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth -39.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, current ratio 1.38x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GLP
Global Partners LP
The Long-Run Compounder
GLP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 432.8% 10Y total return vs SUN's 201.8%
- 2.1% ROA vs SUN's 2.1%, ROIC 7.0% vs 4.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SUN | 11.1% revenue growth vs GLP's 8.1% |
| Value | SUN | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 15.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SUN | 1.6% margin vs GLP's 0.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SUN | Beta 0.13 vs GLP's 0.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SUN | 7.2% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SUN | +31.3% vs GLP's +0.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GLP | 2.1% ROA vs SUN's 2.1%, ROIC 7.0% vs 4.0% |
SUN vs GLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
SUN vs GLP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSUNLAGGINGGLP
GLPGlobal Partners LP
1leads
SUNSunoco LP
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GLPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SUN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GLP8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SUN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SUN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUN and GLP operate at a comparable scale, with $25.2B and $18.6B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.6% (SUN) to 0.4% (GLP). On growth, SUN holds the edge at +63.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SUNSunoco LP | GLPGlobal Partners LP |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.2B | $18.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $340M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $396M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $628M | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +5.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.2% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.8% | +3.8% |
SUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SUN and GLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, SUN trades at a 19% valuation discount to GLP's 22.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLP's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUN's 15.1x.
| Metric | SUNSunoco LP | GLPGlobal Partners LP |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.1B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.4B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.28x | 22.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.27x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.06x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.85x | 5.68x |
Evenly matched — SUN and GLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLP delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for SUN. SUN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLP's 2.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLP scores 6/9 vs SUN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SUNSunoco LP | GLPGlobal Partners LP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 2.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.2B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $891M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.1B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.09x | 2.51x |
GLP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SUN and GLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUN five years ago would be worth $23,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,268 for GLP. Over the past 12 months, SUN leads with a +31.3% total return vs GLP's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLP at 23.1% vs SUN's 20.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SUNSunoco LP | GLPGlobal Partners LP |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.7% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.3% | +0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.5% | +86.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.9% | +132.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.8% | +432.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.6% | +23.1% |
Evenly matched — SUN and GLP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUN is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLP's 0.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUN currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs GLP's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SUNSunoco LP | GLPGlobal Partners LP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.13x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.00 | $56.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.98 | $39.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 469K | 42K |
SUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SUN as "Hold" and GLP as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 1.6% upside for SUN (target: $68) vs -3.8% for GLP (target: $46). SUN is the only dividend payer here at 7.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SUNSunoco LP | GLPGlobal Partners LP |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.79 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SUN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GLP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallSunoco LP (SUN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SUN vs GLP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUN or GLP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the stronger pick with 11.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 1% for Global Partners LP (GLP). Sunoco LP (SUN) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunoco LP (SUN) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUN or GLP?
On trailing P/E, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus Global Partners LP at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Sunoco LP is actually cheaper at 9. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUN or GLP?
Over the past 5 years, Sunoco LP (SUN) delivered a total return of +133.
9%, compared to +132. 7% for Global Partners LP (GLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLP returned +432. 8% versus SUN's +201. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUN or GLP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunoco LP (SUN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
13β versus Global Partners LP's 0. 25β — meaning GLP is approximately 97% more volatile than SUN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunoco LP (SUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Global Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUN or GLP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunoco LP (SUN) is pulling ahead at 11.
1% versus 8. 1% for Global Partners LP (GLP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global Partners LP grew EPS -12. 4% year-over-year, compared to -39. 0% for Sunoco LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLP leads at -0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUN or GLP?
Sunoco LP (SUN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
1% net margin versus 0. 4% for Global Partners LP — meaning it keeps 2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUN leads at 3. 7% versus 1. 3% for GLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUN leads at 8. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUN or GLP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sunoco LP (SUN) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Global Partners LP — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUN: 1. 6% to $68. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUN or GLP?
In this comparison, SUN (7.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SUN or GLP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
13), 7. 2% yield, +201. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUN: +201. 8%, GLP: +432. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUN and GLP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SUN pays a dividend while GLP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SUN: 63.2% · GLP: 11.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SUN: 18.3x · GLP: 22.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.