Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
Solar
Solar
SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $6M | $62.18B | $3.24B | $866M | $1.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72M | $2.45B | $3.17B | $315M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $6M | $568M | $-42M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 31.1% | 23.5% | 50.4% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | 8.2% | -1.8% | -2.7% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.6x | 22.8x | 5.1x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $2.99B | $14.89B | $188M | $766M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2.45B | $1.24B | $10M | $244M |
SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUNation Energy Inc. (SUNE) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 2694.2 | +2594.2% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SUNE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.00
- 1.1K% 10Y total return vs BE's 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.00, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 0.47x
- Beta 2.00 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +14.6% vs SPWR's -42.4%
RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
- 17.9% margin vs SUNE's -15.1%
- 2.5% ROA vs SUNE's -23.4%, ROIC -0.5% vs -5.0%
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 11.7x)
ARRY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.32, current ratio 2.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 11.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs SUNE's -15.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.00 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs SPWR's -42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs SUNE's -23.4%, ROIC -0.5% vs -5.0% |
SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUNE leads in 3 of 6 categories
BE leads 2 • RUN leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • ARRY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 44.2x SUNE's $72M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUNE's -15.1%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $2.4B | $3.2B | $315M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $830,615 | $240M | $541M | -$6M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $6M | $568M | -$42M | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $955,000 | $233M | -$326M | -$15M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +31.1% | +23.5% | +50.4% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +8.2% | -1.8% | -2.7% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.1% | +0.2% | +17.9% | -13.2% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +9.5% | -10.3% | -4.6% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.0% | +130.4% | +43.2% | -0.2% | -26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.2% | +3.3% | +2.1% | -101.3% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SUNE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SUNE's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $62.2B | $3.2B | $866M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $62.7B | $16.9B | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | -699.03x | 8.07x | -15.25x | -11.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.56x | 22.75x | 5.10x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.58x | 508.37x | 24.31x | — | 13.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 30.72x | 1.09x | 2.80x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 78.41x | 0.75x | — | 4.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.92x | 1087.24x | — | — | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-53 for SUNE. SUNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BE's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SUNE scores 7/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.5% | +0.8% | +12.4% | — | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.4% | +0.2% | +2.5% | -19.5% | -4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | +4.1% | -0.5% | -5.3% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.5% | +2.5% | -0.6% | -7.2% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 3.77x | 2.99x | — | 2.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $538M | $13.6B | $179M | $522M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2.5B | $1.2B | $10M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3.0B | $14.9B | $188M | $766M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.90x | 1.05x | -0.02x | -1.57x | -2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUNE five years ago would be worth $7,704,192 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs SUNE's -89.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.7% | +162.1% | -29.0% | -38.2% | -15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.0% | +1464.7% | +86.7% | -42.4% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +1425.9% | -19.7% | -81.3% | -56.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76941.9% | +1013.4% | -69.8% | -81.3% | -67.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107450.2% | +934.6% | +86.7% | -81.3% | -77.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.1% | +148.0% | -7.1% | -42.8% | -24.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SUNE and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUNE is the less volatile stock with a 2.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.00x | 3.61x | 2.89x | 2.13x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.46 | $302.99 | $22.44 | $2.27 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $16.18 | $5.38 | $0.81 | $4.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.0% | +85.4% | +61.5% | +44.9% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 72.6 | 49.0 | 45.9 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 10.1M | 10.4M | 1.7M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SUNE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", ARRY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.56 | $18.14 | $15.81 | $9.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 36 | 45 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SUNE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SUNE vs BE vs RUN vs SPWR vs ARRY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY?
On forward P/E, SunPower Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY?
Over the past 5 years, SUNation Energy Inc.
(SUNE) delivered a total return of +769. 4%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUNE returned +1075% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SUNation Energy Inc.
(SUNE) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 00β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 80% more volatile than SUNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SUNation Energy Inc. (SUNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -15. 1% for SUNation Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARRY leads at 6. 6% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 118. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SUNE or BE or RUN or SPWR or ARRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SUNation Energy Inc.
(SUNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1075% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUNE: +1075%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUNE and BE and RUN and SPWR and ARRY?
These companies operate in different sectors (SUNE (Industrials) and BE (Industrials) and RUN (Energy) and SPWR (Energy) and ARRY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SUNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.