Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SUNE
SUNation Energy Inc.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
SPWR
SunPower Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$866M
5Y Perf.-51.4%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+10.3%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.24B
5Y Perf.-4.5%

SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SUNE logoSUNE
SPWR logoSPWR
FSLR logoFSLR
RUN logoRUN
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$6M$866M$23.06B$3.24B
Revenue (TTM)$72M$315M$5.42B$3.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-42M$1.67B$568M
Gross Margin38.3%50.4%41.7%23.5%
Operating Margin-2.3%-2.7%33.0%-1.8%
Forward P/E5.1x12.0x22.8x
Total Debt$5M$188M$499M$14.89B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$10M$2.80B$1.24B

SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SUNE
SPWR
FSLR
RUN
StockOct 24May 26Return
SUNation Energy Inc. (SUNE)1000.2-99.8%
SunPower Inc. (SPWR)10048.6-51.4%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100110.3+10.3%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)10095.5-4.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sunrun Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SPWR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SUNE
SUNation Energy Inc.
The Income Pick

SUNE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.00
  • 1.1K% 10Y total return vs FSLR's 324.1%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Value Play

SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (5.1x vs 22.8x)
Best for: value
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
  • 30.7% margin vs SUNE's -15.1%
  • Beta 1.39 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Growth Play

RUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
  • +86.7% vs SPWR's -42.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
ValueSPWR logoSPWRLower P/E (5.1x vs 22.8x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs SUNE's -15.1%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RUN logoRUN+86.7% vs SPWR's -42.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs SUNE's -23.4%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.0%

SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SUNESUNation Energy Inc.
FY 2014
Solar
62.3%$1.6B
Semiconductor
32.8%$840M
Terraform
4.9%$126M
SPWRSunPower Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$109M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M

SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSUNELAGGINGRUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 75.4x SUNE's $72M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUNE's -15.1%. On growth, SUNE holds the edge at +77.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$72M$315M$5.4B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$830,615-$6M$2.2B$541M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$42M$1.7B$568M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$955,000-$15M$1.7B-$326M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.3%+50.4%+41.7%+23.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%-2.7%+33.0%-1.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-15.1%-13.2%+30.7%+17.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.3%-4.6%+30.8%-10.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.0%-0.2%+23.6%+43.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.2%-101.3%+65.1%+2.1%
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SUNE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 47% valuation discount to FSLR's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SUNE's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
Market CapShares × price$6M$866M$23.1B$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$1.0B$20.8B$16.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.38x-15.25x15.10x8.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.10x12.04x22.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.58x9.38x24.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.08x2.80x4.42x1.09x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.17x2.42x0.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.92x19.42x
SUNE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-53 for SUNE. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SUNE scores 7/9 vs SPWR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-52.5%+18.0%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.4%-19.5%+12.6%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.0%-5.3%+17.6%-0.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.5%-7.2%+15.9%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.05x2.99x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M$179M-$2.3B$13.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$10M$2.8B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$188M$499M$14.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.90x-1.57x53.51x-0.02x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SUNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SUNE five years ago would be worth $7,704,192 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +86.7% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SUNE's -89.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+53.7%-38.2%-21.8%-29.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.0%-42.4%+65.3%+86.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-81.3%+20.9%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76941.9%-81.3%+187.6%-69.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+107450.2%-81.3%+324.1%+86.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.1%-42.8%+6.5%-7.1%
SUNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.00x2.13x1.39x2.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.46$2.27$285.99$22.44
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.68$0.81$125.80$5.38
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.0%+44.9%+75.0%+61.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.345.964.349.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M1.7M2.1M10.4M
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SUNE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", RUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 23.1% for FSLR (target: $264).

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.81$264.13$18.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts457336
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises211
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
SUNE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SUNE leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallSUNation Energy Inc. (SUNE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SUNE vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus First Solar, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?

Over the past 5 years, SUNation Energy Inc.

(SUNE) delivered a total return of +769. 4%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUNE returned +1075% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 108% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -15. 1% for SUNation Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.

(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SUNE or SPWR or FSLR or RUN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+324. 1% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +324. 1%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SUNE and SPWR and FSLR and RUN?

These companies operate in different sectors (SUNE (Industrials) and SPWR (Energy) and FSLR (Energy) and RUN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SUNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SUNE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 38%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SUNE and SPWR and FSLR and RUN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SUNE: 77.0% · SPWR: -0.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.