Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SVCC logo
SVCC
BFLY logo
BFLY
JPM logo
JPM
GS logo
GS
MS logo
MS
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SVCC
Stellar V Capital Corp. Class A Ordinary Shares

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$228M
5Y Perf.+5.5%
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.+143.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+30.7%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$337.53B
5Y Perf.+94.5%
MS
Morgan Stanley

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$340.97B
5Y Perf.+83.5%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+15.4%

SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SVCC logoSVCC
BFLY logoBFLY
JPM logoJPM
GS logoGS
MS logoMS
KO logoKO
IndustryShell CompaniesMedical - DevicesBanks - DiversifiedFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$228M$1.45B$896.00B$337.53B$340.97B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$103M$280.33B$125.10B$114.98B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$-76M$57.05B$17.18B$16.86B$13.70B
Gross Margin49.2%60.0%47.5%57.1%61.7%
Operating Margin-79.5%25.9%17.5%19.1%29.3%
Forward P/E40.5x14.4x17.9x18.0x25.3x
Total Debt$0.00$20M$942.38B$609.53B$475.56B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$354K$150M$343.34B$164.26B$111.69B$10.27B

SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SVCC
BFLY
JPM
GS
MS
KO
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
Stellar V Capital C… (SVCC)100105.5+5.5%
Butterfly Network, … (BFLY)100243.0+143.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100130.7+30.7%
The Goldman Sachs G… (GS)100194.5+94.5%
Morgan Stanley (MS)100183.5+83.5%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100115.4+15.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Butterfly Network, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SVCC
Stellar V Capital Corp. Class A Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick

SVCC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.6% vs MS's 0.7%
Best for: bank quality
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
The Growth Play

BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs GS's -1.4%
  • +127.0% vs SVCC's +3.3%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 6 stocks, GS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
MS
Morgan Stanley
The Banking Pick

MS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 8.5% 10Y total return vs GS's 6.7%
  • Beta 1.40, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs GS's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs -76.8%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFLY logoBFLY19.0% revenue growth vs GS's -1.4%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs BFLY's 3.21
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs GS's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BFLY logoBFLY+127.0% vs SVCC's +3.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs -76.8%

SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SVCCStellar V Capital Corp. Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

BFLYButterfly Network, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.0%$63M
Software And Other Services
35.0%$34M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Markets
71.1%$41.5B
Investment Management
28.6%$16.7B
Platform Solutions
0.3%$151M
MSMorgan Stanley
FY 2025
Institutional Securities Segment
46.4%$33.1B
Wealth Management Segment
44.5%$31.8B
Investment Management Segment
9.1%$6.5B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and SVCC operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSVCC logoSVCCStellar V Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$103M$280.3B$125.1B$115.0B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M-$76M$81.4B$24.0B$26.6B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M-$76M$57.0B$17.2B$16.9B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$545,447-$19M$100.9B-$47.2B-$17.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.2%+60.0%+47.5%+57.1%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-79.5%+25.9%+17.5%+19.1%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-73.6%+20.4%+13.7%+14.7%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.3%+36.0%-37.7%-15.6%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.0%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.5%+16.0%+16.0%+45.8%+48.9%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 61% valuation discount to SVCC's 40.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSVCC logoSVCCStellar V Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$228M$1.4B$896.0B$337.5B$341.0B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$227M$1.3B$1.50T$782.8B$704.8B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.54x-17.87x16.00x20.71x20.98x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x17.93x18.00x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x1.32x2.19x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x32.57x26.49x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue14.85x3.20x2.70x2.97x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.99x6.99x2.47x2.70x3.03x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x7.40x67.15x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 4.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MS scores 7/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSVCC logoSVCCStellar V Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%-36.8%+15.9%+13.6%+15.3%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.1%-25.6%+1.3%+1.0%+1.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.6%-76.8%+4.5%+2.2%+3.1%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.8%-39.3%+8.9%+4.0%+3.3%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9335577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x2.60x4.88x4.22x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$354,108-$130M$599.0B$445.3B$363.9B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$354,108$150M$343.3B$164.3B$111.7B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$20M$942.4B$609.5B$475.6B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-71.59x0.74x0.33x0.45x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $30,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,994 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +127.0% total return vs SVCC's +3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 48.1% vs SVCC's 1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSVCC logoSVCCStellar V Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.6%+47.7%-0.5%+17.2%+18.8%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.3%+127.0%+21.8%+72.7%+65.3%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.9%+150.7%+138.2%+224.8%+157.5%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.9%-60.1%+118.2%+200.5%+154.7%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.9%-44.0%+465.8%+666.8%+854.4%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.9%+35.8%+33.6%+48.1%+37.1%+13.7%
GS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SVCC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SVCC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs BFLY's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSVCC logoSVCCStellar V Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.00x3.21x0.94x1.60x1.40x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.59$5.97$337.25$1095.89$219.16$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.18$1.32$262.71$609.59$128.81$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.5%+92.8%+95.1%+97.0%+97.7%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.165.859.157.362.260.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K4.9M7.0M1.9M4.5M12.7M
Evenly matched — SVCC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", GS as "Hold", MS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -8.5% for GS (target: $973). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs GS's 1.56%.

MetricSVCC logoSVCCStellar V Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…MS logoMSMorgan StanleyKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.42$339.75$972.70$201.25$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts761555248
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+1.6%+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15141256
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$16.62$4.14$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%+3.7%+1.7%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SVCC vs BFLY vs JPM vs GS vs MS vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Stellar V Capital Corp. Class A Ordinary Shares at 40. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) delivered a total return of +200. 5%, compared to -60. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +854. 4% versus BFLY's -44. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning BFLY is approximately -1703% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -1. 4% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stellar V Capital Corp. Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 966. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFLY leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), MS (1. 9% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), GS (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SVCC, BFLY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SVCC or BFLY or JPM or GS or MS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, BFLY: -44. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SVCC and BFLY and JPM and GS and MS and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (SVCC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and GS (Financial Services) and MS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SVCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; GS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, GS, MS, KO pay a dividend while SVCC, BFLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.