SWIM vs MAS vs SHW vs TREX

For growth investors, Latham Group, Inc.

(SWIM) is the stronger pick with 7. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.

6x versus Latham Group, Inc. at 62. 0x. On forward P/E, Masco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Masco Corporation wins at 3. 40x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x.

Over the past 5 years, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) delivered a total return of +16.

1%, compared to -80. 1% for Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +250. 0% versus SWIM's -78. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

79β versus Latham Group, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning SWIM is approximately 166% more volatile than SHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Latham Group, Inc.

(SWIM) is pulling ahead at 7. 4% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Latham Group, Inc. grew EPS 161. 9% year-over-year, compared to -14. 8% for Trex Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHW leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Trex Company, Inc.

(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 2. 0% for Latham Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus 5. 8% for SWIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 40x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Masco Corporation (MAS) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for Latham Group, Inc. — 17. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWIM: 43. 5% to $8. 25.

In this comparison, MAS (1.

7% yield), SHW (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SWIM, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 1. 0% yield, +250. 0% 10Y return). Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHW: +250. 0%, SWIM: -78. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SWIM (Industrials) and MAS (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials) and TREX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

MAS, SHW pay a dividend while SWIM, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.