Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Industrial - Machinery
SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $12.60B | $19.47B | $2.75B | $73.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.23B | $5.12B | $2.14B | $16.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $371M | $1.02B | $137M | $3.13B |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 51.3% | 31.8% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 24.7% | 9.6% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 19.6x | 11.2x | 22.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $1.33B | $643M | $8.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $280M | $1.62B | $141M | $851M |
SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 288.4 | +188.4% |
| Kennametal Inc. (KMT) | 100 | 130.1 | +30.1% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 147.7 | +47.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SWK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%
SNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 0.9%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 4.79x
- PEG 1.80 vs ITW's 2.35
- 0.9% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9%
KMT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.9% vs ITW's +7.4%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 188.6% 10Y total return vs SNA's 168.1%
- Beta 0.68, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.68 vs SWK's 1.83
- 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.9% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 22.6x), PEG 1.80 vs 2.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.9% vs ITW's +7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8% |
SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWK leads 2 • KMT leads 0 • ITW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 7.6x KMT's $2.1B. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWK's 2.4%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $5.1B | $2.1B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $1.4B | $275M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $371M | $1.0B | $137M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726M | $1.1B | $73M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +51.3% | +31.8% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +24.7% | +9.6% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +20.0% | +6.4% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +21.0% | +3.4% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -2.9% | +21.8% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +4.0% | +82.9% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SNA trades at a 36% valuation discount to SWK's 30.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SNA offers better value at 1.79x vs ITW's 2.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.6B | $19.5B | $2.8B | $73.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.2B | $19.2B | $3.3B | $81.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.59x | 19.49x | 30.08x | 24.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.83x | 19.57x | 11.25x | 22.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.79x | — | 2.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.80x | 13.44x | 11.64x | 17.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 3.78x | 1.40x | 4.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 3.33x | 2.12x | 23.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.32x | 19.36x | 23.05x | 27.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWK scores 6/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +17.4% | +10.1% | +97.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +12.2% | +5.3% | +19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +18.1% | +5.9% | +29.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +18.4% | +6.8% | +38.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.22x | 0.49x | 2.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | -$298M | $503M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $280M | $1.6B | $141M | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $1.3B | $643M | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.07x | 27.12x | 5.27x | 14.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNA five years ago would be worth $16,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,402 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +77.9% total return vs ITW's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNA at 15.3% vs SWK's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +7.3% | +25.2% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.4% | +20.9% | +77.9% | +7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | +53.2% | +43.0% | +19.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | +60.4% | -2.7% | +18.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +168.1% | +96.1% | +188.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +15.3% | +12.7% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNA currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs KMT's 82.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.76x | 1.36x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $93.37 | $400.88 | $43.81 | $303.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.54 | $301.82 | $17.62 | $238.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +93.3% | +82.4% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 46.1 | 60.9 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 367K | 1.3M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SWK as "Hold", SNA as "Buy", KMT as "Hold", ITW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for SNA (target: $413) vs 3.9% for KMT (target: $38). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs KMT's 2.20%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.17 | $413.00 | $37.50 | $271.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 17 | 23 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 16 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | $8.72 | $0.79 | $6.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.7% | +2.2% | +2.0% |
SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
SWK vs SNA vs KMT vs ITW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger pick with 0.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW?
On trailing P/E, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, Kennametal Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Snap-on Incorporated wins at 1. 80x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW?
Over the past 5 years, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) delivered a total return of +60.
4%, compared to -56. 0% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITW returned +188. 6% versus SWK's -0. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 168% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is pulling ahead at 0.
9% versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -12. 4% for Kennametal Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNA leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 2. 7% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 3% for KMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 80x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 35x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Kennametal Inc. (KMT) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNA: 10. 4% to $413. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT).
09Is SWK or SNA or KMT or ITW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 4% yield, +188. 6% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +188. 6%, SWK: -0. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SWK and SNA and KMT and ITW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.