Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Waste Management
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Auto - Dealerships
SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Waste Management | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $671K | $737K | $42M | $17M | $304M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $36M | $0.00 | $66M | $3.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-6M | $-14M | $-43M | $-178M |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 33.3% | — | 23.0% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | -154.0% | -17.9% | — | -86.5% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $984K | $952K | $0.00 | $34M | $170M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $10M | $3M | $99M | $1.29B |
SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China SXT Pharmaceu… (SXTC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Sunshine Biopharma,… (SBFM) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SXTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SBFM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 97.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 434.5%
- 44.7% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 0.0% margin vs SXTC's -189.8%
- +2.1% vs SXTC's -99.4%
RCON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.49
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.49 vs CANG's 2.49
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -43.2% 10Y total return vs CHNR's -93.5%
- -2.3% ROA vs SBFM's -19.7%, ROIC 4.6% vs -42.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.0% margin vs SXTC's -189.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs CANG's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.1% vs SXTC's -99.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs SBFM's -19.7%, ROIC 4.6% vs -42.9% |
SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CANG leads in 4 of 6 categories
SBFM leads 1 • SXTC leads 0 • CHNR leads 0 • RCON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. CANG is the more profitable business, keeping -5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SXTC's -189.8%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $36M | $0 | $66M | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$6M | -$12M | -$54M | $333M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$6M | -$14M | -$43M | -$178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$9M | -$6M | -$44M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +33.3% | — | +23.0% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -154.0% | -17.9% | — | -86.5% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -189.8% | -17.4% | — | -64.3% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -134.8% | -26.1% | — | -65.9% | -154.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +1.2% | — | +2.6% | +58.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -119.1% | +21.5% | +91.3% | +35.7% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SBFM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $670,507 | $736,836 | $42M | $17M | $304M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$16M | -$8M | $41M | $7M | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | -0.14x | -88.65x | -1.21x | 6.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 5.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 0.02x | — | 1.70x | 2.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 0.03x | 3.21x | 0.11x | 0.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CANG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CANG delivers a -4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-25 for SBFM. SBFM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCON's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SXTC scores 4/9 vs SBFM's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.4% | -24.6% | -15.7% | -9.2% | -4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.2% | -19.7% | -5.3% | -8.0% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -142.0% | -42.9% | -0.0% | -10.6% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.9% | -25.2% | -0.0% | -11.8% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.04x | — | 0.08x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$9M | -$3M | -$64M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $10M | $3M | $99M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $983,877 | $952,480 | $0 | $34M | $170M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.14x | -757.53x | -263.29x | -372.30x | -1.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $10,206 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SBFM. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a +2.1% total return vs SXTC's -99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANG at 7.2% vs SBFM's -89.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.4% | -18.0% | +22.2% | -46.4% | -53.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.4% | -14.6% | +2.1% | -53.4% | -69.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -99.9% | -79.7% | -88.8% | +23.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -92.6% | -99.4% | +2.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -93.5% | -99.3% | -43.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.6% | -89.9% | -41.2% | -51.8% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHNR and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs SXTC's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 1.33x | 1.10x | 0.49x | 2.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1046.98 | $2.43 | $8.20 | $7.16 | $2.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.08 | $0.95 | $3.16 | $0.75 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +43.2% | +52.4% | +11.6% | +22.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.3 | 56.2 | 55.8 | 38.3 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 37K | 893K | 91K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $3.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% |
CANG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBFM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SXTC vs SBFM vs CHNR vs RCON vs CANG: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.
(SBFM) is the stronger pick with 44. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of +2. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. (SBFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -43. 2% versus SBFM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning CANG is approximately 408% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. (SBFM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 8% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.
(SBFM) is pulling ahead at 44. 7% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBFM leads at 434. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -189. 8% for China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -154. 0% for SXTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SXTC or SBFM or CHNR or RCON or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49)). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCON: -99. 3%, CANG: -43. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SXTC and SBFM and CHNR and RCON and CANG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SXTC (Healthcare) and SBFM (Healthcare) and CHNR (Industrials) and RCON (Energy) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SXTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBFM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.