Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.13B | $8.88B | $77.41B | $54.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $840M | $2.79B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-13M | $616M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 45.0% | 55.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -6.4% | -0.0% | 26.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 28.1x | 92.1x | 67.2x | 63.2x |
| Total Debt | $880M | $368M | $24M | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $392M | $121M | $1.10B | $772M |
SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synaptics Incorpora… (SYNA) | 100 | 163.6 | +63.6% |
| Allegro MicroSystem… (ALGM) | 100 | 267.5 | +167.5% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 500.9 | +400.9% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 188.6 | +88.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (28.1x vs 63.2x)
ALGM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +156.4% vs SYNA's +81.7%
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs MCHP's 373.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
- 26.4% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 1.8%
- Beta 1.70, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.70 vs ALGM's 2.43
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.1x vs 63.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs SYNA's -4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs ALGM's 2.43 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.4% vs SYNA's +81.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SYNA's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.0% |
SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SYNA leads 1 • MCHP leads 1 • ALGM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 5.2x ALGM's $840M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYNA's -4.1%. On growth, ALGM holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $840M | $2.8B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $66M | $781M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$13M | $616M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $121M | $664M | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +45.0% | +55.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | -0.0% | +26.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -1.6% | +22.1% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +28.9% | +20.8% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | +2.2% | -88.4% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SYNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MCHP's 57.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALGM's 204.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $8.9B | $77.4B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $9.1B | $76.3B | $59.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -86.72x | -122.90x | 123.60x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.08x | 92.13x | 67.24x | 63.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 94.16x | 204.21x | 97.90x | 57.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 12.25x | 27.74x | 12.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.98x | 9.66x | 21.56x | 7.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.84x | 404.45x | 116.20x | 71.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SYNA. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs ALGM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | -1.4% | +17.9% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | -0.9% | +15.2% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | -1.3% | +22.2% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | -1.5% | +20.4% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.40x | 0.01x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $489M | $247M | -$1.1B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $392M | $121M | $1.1B | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $880M | $368M | $24M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.00x | -0.24x | — | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,087 for SYNA. Over the past 12 months, ALGM leads with a +156.4% total return vs SYNA's +81.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs ALGM's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.7% | +78.1% | +68.5% | +56.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.7% | +156.4% | +148.6% | +115.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.7% | +27.4% | +280.3% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | +93.3% | +366.2% | +45.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +170.8% | +2494.7% | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | +8.4% | +56.1% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MCHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCHP is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALGM's 2.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs ALGM's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 2.39x | 2.27x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.43 | $51.40 | $1662.00 | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.80 | $18.17 | $613.00 | $46.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +93.2% | +94.8% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.5 | 78.8 | 71.0 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 739K | 1.9M | 577K | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MPWR and MCHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYNA as "Buy", ALGM as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.7% upside for ALGM (target: $53) vs 2.5% for MPWR (target: $1615). For income investors, MCHP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.79% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $114.50 | $52.57 | $1615.00 | $106.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 13 | 25 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.90 | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +9.6% | +0.0% | +0.2% |
MPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SYNA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SYNA vs ALGM vs MPWR vs MCHP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) offers the better valuation at 123. 6x trailing P/E (67. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP?
On forward P/E, Synaptics Incorporated is actually cheaper at 28.
1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -19. 1% for Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +25. 3% versus SYNA's +90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
69β versus Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning ALGM is approximately 42% more volatile than MCHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. grew EPS -65. 2% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -10. 1% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -8. 8% for SYNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHP leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) trades at 28.
1x forward P/E versus 92. 1x for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. — 64. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALGM: 9. 7% to $52. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP?
In this comparison, MCHP (1.
8% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SYNA, ALGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYNA or ALGM or MPWR or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +363. 4% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCHP: +363. 4%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYNA and ALGM and MPWR and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MCHP pays a dividend while SYNA, ALGM, MPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.