Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Medical - Care Facilities
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Medical - Care Facilities | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $6M | $3.92B | $2.47B | $868M | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $901M | $959M | $229M | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-183K | $94M | $-51M | $8M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 44.4% | 11.3% | 43.0% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 12.1% | -3.8% | 1.4% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.7x | 62.2x | 38.2x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $144K | $303M | $186M | $0.00 | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $766M | $98M | $37M | $675M |
SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syra Health Corp. C… (SYRA) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 327.0 | +227.0% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 230.1 | +130.1% |
| Talkspace, Inc. (TALK) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 347.6 | +247.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYRA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 6.9%, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 0.19 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
- +5.2% vs TALK's +70.4%
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
- Lower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x)
- 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Among these 5 stocks, ICHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TALK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
- 22.0% revenue growth vs SYRA's -9.5%
- 5.9% ROA vs SYRA's -5.4%, ROIC 3.9% vs -86.8%
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.0% revenue growth vs SYRA's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs TALK's +70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs SYRA's -5.4%, ROIC 3.9% vs -86.8% |
SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 1 of 6 categories
SYRA leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • TALK leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SYRA and MKSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 532.9x SYRA's $8M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, TALK holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $901M | $959M | $229M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$227,636 | $126M | -$11M | $7M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$183,089 | $94M | -$51M | $8M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $755,858 | -$69M | -$17M | -$2M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +44.4% | +11.3% | +43.0% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +12.1% | -3.8% | +1.4% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +10.4% | -5.3% | +3.4% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | -7.6% | -1.7% | -0.9% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | +9.4% | +4.7% | +29.3% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.8% | -76.1% | +46.2% | — | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ACMR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 67% valuation discount to TALK's 129.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 137.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $868M | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $3.5B | $2.6B | $830M | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | 43.21x | -46.25x | 129.50x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.68x | 62.25x | 38.20x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.49x | — | 137.77x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 4.35x | 2.61x | 3.79x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 2.06x | 3.67x | 7.69x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACMR and TALK and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SYRA. SYRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TALK scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | +6.1% | -7.5% | +6.9% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +3.9% | -5.2% | +5.9% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.8% | +7.0% | -3.9% | +3.9% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +6.6% | -4.7% | +2.7% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.16x | 0.28x | — | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$463M | $87M | -$37M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $766M | $98M | $37M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143,787 | $303M | $186M | $0 | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -55.59x | 20.44x | -5.97x | — | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SYRA and ACMR and TALK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,668 for SYRA. Over the past 12 months, SYRA leads with a +517.7% total return vs TALK's +70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALK at 80.7% vs SYRA's -45.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +475.1% | +31.9% | +249.0% | +47.6% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +517.7% | +195.6% | +329.1% | +70.4% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +487.9% | +151.1% | +490.0% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +133.4% | +28.9% | -47.7% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | -48.7% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.0% | +80.5% | +35.9% | +80.7% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYRA and TALK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SYRA's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 3.24x | 3.93x | 0.86x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.70 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $5.20 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $2.22 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.5% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +99.6% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 62.7 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 1.2M | 795K | 4.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", TALK as "Hold", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.4% upside for TALK (target: $5) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | $49.80 | $5.25 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 14 | 10 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +0.2% |
ACMR leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
SYRA vs ACMR vs ICHR vs TALK vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the stronger pick with 22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 129. 5x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -83. 3% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus SYRA's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Syra Health Corp.
Class A Common Stock (SYRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 2004% more volatile than SYRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is pulling ahead at 22. 0% versus -9. 5% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 85. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -12. 4% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -12. 5% for SYRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TALK: 1. 4% to $5. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SYRA, ICHR, TALK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYRA or ACMR or ICHR or TALK or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Syra Health Corp.
Class A Common Stock (SYRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYRA: -83. 3%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYRA and ACMR and ICHR and TALK and MKSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SYRA (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and TALK (Healthcare) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SYRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.