Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6M | $124M | $113M | $5.24B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $109M | $311M | $638M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-183K | $5M | $-178M | $239M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 67.3% | 48.7% | 89.7% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 10.7% | -51.7% | 37.4% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x | 14.1x | 16.8x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $144K | $5M | $20M | $12M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $23M | $51M | $210M | $551M |
SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syra Health Corp. C… (SYRA) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 175.5 | +75.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +5.2% vs HCAT's -59.9%
OPRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 124.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 11.9x)
Among these 5 stocks, HCAT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DOCS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.21 vs INVA's 1.15
- 20.0% revenue growth vs SYRA's -9.5%
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- 94.9% 10Y total return vs OPRX's 110.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs SYRA's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs HCAT's -57.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs OPRX's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs HCAT's -59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -32.9% |
SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
INVA leads 2 • DOCS leads 1 • SYRA leads 0 • HCAT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS is the larger business by revenue, generating $638M annually — 83.5x SYRA's $8M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCAT's -57.2%. On growth, SYRA holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $109M | $311M | $638M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$227,636 | $16M | -$110M | $250M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$183,089 | $5M | -$178M | $239M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $755,858 | $12M | -$5M | $314M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +67.3% | +48.7% | +89.7% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +10.7% | -51.7% | +37.4% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +4.7% | -57.2% | +37.5% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +10.6% | -1.5% | +49.2% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | -0.2% | -6.2% | +9.8% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.8% | — | -2.9% | -16.2% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 72% valuation discount to OPRX's 24.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.30x vs INVA's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $124M | $113M | $5.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $105M | $82M | $5.0B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | 24.56x | -0.62x | 23.45x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.04x | 14.15x | 16.83x | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.30x | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.55x | — | 21.14x | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 1.13x | 0.36x | 9.18x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 0.98x | 0.45x | 4.84x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.62x | — | 19.64x | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DOCS and INVA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-55 for HCAT. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVA's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs INVA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | +4.2% | -54.7% | +24.4% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +3.0% | -27.4% | +20.7% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.8% | +7.1% | -32.9% | +20.0% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +7.6% | -34.0% | +22.3% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.04x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$19M | -$31M | -$197M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $23M | $51M | $210M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143,787 | $5M | $20M | $12M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -55.59x | 1.26x | -4.79x | — | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for HCAT. Over the past 12 months, SYRA leads with a +517.7% total return vs HCAT's -59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs HCAT's -49.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +475.1% | -46.6% | -30.3% | -39.9% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +517.7% | -30.1% | -59.9% | -55.4% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | -54.4% | -86.9% | -24.2% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | -87.3% | -97.0% | -50.9% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +110.5% | -95.9% | -50.9% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.0% | -23.0% | -49.2% | -8.8% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs OPRX's 29.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 2.28x | 2.05x | 1.03x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.70 | $22.25 | $5.06 | $76.51 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $5.54 | $0.96 | $20.55 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.5% | +29.8% | +31.4% | +34.0% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 46.9 | 63.9 | 60.1 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 476K | 720K | 2.7M | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRX as "Buy", HCAT as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 57.2% for HCAT (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $2.50 | $42.79 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 22 | 22 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +2.3% | +0.2% |
OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). INVA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SYRA vs OPRX vs HCAT vs DOCS vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus OptimizeRx Corporation at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 1. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -97. 0% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +110. 5% versus HCAT's -95. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning OPRX is approximately 1706% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Innoviva, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -9. 5% for Syra Health Corp. Class A Common Stock (SYRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -121. 7% for Health Catalyst, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRX leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -57. 2% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Doximity, Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SYRA or OPRX or HCAT or DOCS or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, HCAT: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYRA and OPRX and HCAT and DOCS and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.