Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SYRE vs TERN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
SYRE vs TERN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $25.30B | $4.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-179M | $-94M |
| Operating Margin | -256.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $161M |
SYRE vs TERN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spyre Therapeutics,… (SYRE) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Terns Pharmaceutica… (TERN) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYRE vs TERN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 37.7%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs TERN's -7.6%
- -27.8% ROA vs TERN's -28.5%, ROIC -29.7% vs -42.2%
TERN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 187.9% 10Y total return vs SYRE's -66.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 23.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs TERN's -7.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs SYRE's -198.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SYRE's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.5% vs SYRE's +475.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -27.8% ROA vs TERN's -28.5%, ROIC -29.7% vs -42.2% |
SYRE vs TERN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYRE vs TERN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TERN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYRE and TERN operate at a comparable scale, with $90M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$171M | -$108M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$179M | -$94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$186M | -$78M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -198.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.3B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.2B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -36.92x | -47.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 35.37x | 12.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYRE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TERN delivers a -30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-30 in annual profit, vs $-31 for SYRE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TERN scores 3/9 vs SYRE's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.2% | -30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.8% | -28.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | -42.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | -33.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$86M | -$160M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SYRE and TERN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TERN five years ago would be worth $31,859 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,039 for SYRE. Over the past 12 months, TERN leads with a +1647.5% total return vs SYRE's +475.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYRE at 164.5% vs TERN's 59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +139.0% | +32.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +475.1% | +1647.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1750.6% | +302.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.6% | +218.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.8% | +187.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +164.5% | +59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TERN is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYRE's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TERN currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SYRE's 96.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.00 | $53.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.29 | $2.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 74.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SYRE as "Buy" and TERN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for SYRE (target: $82) vs 4.9% for TERN (target: $56).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.90 | $55.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TERN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SYRE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SYRE vs TERN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYRE or TERN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Spyre Therapeutics, Inc.
(SYRE) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SYRE or TERN?
Over the past 5 years, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) delivered a total return of +218. 6%, compared to -59. 6% for Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. (SYRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TERN returned +187. 9% versus SYRE's -66. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SYRE or TERN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning SYRE is approximately 421% more volatile than TERN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SYRE or TERN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spyre Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 37. 7% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SYRE or TERN?
Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -198. 3% for Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TERN leads at 0. 0% versus -256. 0% for SYRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SYRE leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SYRE or TERN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SYRE or TERN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +187. 9% 10Y return). Spyre Therapeutics, Inc. (SYRE) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TERN: +187. 9%, SYRE: -66. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SYRE and TERN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.