TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$287M
5Y Perf.-0.5%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisTACH
CG
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TACH vs CG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$16.52B
5Y Perf.-11.0%
TACH vs CG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  TACH |  CG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $287M | $16.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $547M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $74.00 | $13.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25.00 | $3.21B |
TACH vs CG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TACH
CG
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan Acquisition C… (TACH) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| The Carlyle Group I… (CG) | 100 | 89.0 | -11.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TACH vs CG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TACH leads in 2 of 3 categories, making it the strongest pick for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. The Carlyle Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇TACH emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
TACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for momentum and efficiency.
- +3.0% vs CG's -1.2%
- 3.8% ROA vs CG's 2.0%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
The Banking Pick
CG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 273.5% 10Y total return vs TACH's 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, current ratio 15.72x
- Beta 1.67, yield 3.0%, current ratio 15.72x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends |  CG | 3.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) |  TACH | +3.0% vs CG's -1.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TACH | 3.8% ROA vs CG's 2.0% |
TACH vs CG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TACH vs CG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTACHLAGGINGCG
CGThe Carlyle Group Inc.
1leads
TACHTitan Acquisition Cor…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TACH1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TACH4/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TACH2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CG and TACH operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | CGThe Carlyle Group… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$99,706 | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $547M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$536,520 | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +73.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | CGThe Carlyle Group… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $16.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $27.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -246.45x | 20.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.12x |
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $8 for CG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CG scores 4/9 vs TACH's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | CGThe Carlyle Group… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49 | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25 | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74 | $13.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.84x |
TACH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CG five years ago would be worth $12,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,297 for TACH. Over the past 12 months, TACH leads with a +3.0% total return vs CG's -1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CG at 18.1% vs TACH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | CGThe Carlyle Group… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -23.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.0% | -1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +64.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +20.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +273.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +18.1% |
CG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACH is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CG's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TACH currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs CG's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | CGThe Carlyle Group… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $69.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.04 | $41.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 3.1M |
TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CG is the only dividend payer here at 2.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | CGThe Carlyle Group… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TACH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CG leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallTitan Acquisition Corp. (TACH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TACH vs CG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TACH or CG a better buy right now?
The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TACH or CG?
Over the past 5 years, The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) delivered a total return of +20. 3%, compared to +3. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. (TACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CG returned +273. 5% versus TACH's +3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TACH or CG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus The Carlyle Group Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning CG is approximately -7367% more volatile than TACH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — TACH or CG?
The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CG leads at 26. 2% versus 0. 0% for TACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CG leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TACH or CG?
In this comparison, CG (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. TACH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is TACH or CG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACH: +3. 0%, CG: +273. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TACH and CG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TACH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CG pays a dividend while TACH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.