Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TAIT vs CLFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
TAIT vs CLFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $8M | $519M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-972K | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 72.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $21M |
TAIT vs CLFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taitron Components … (TAIT) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAIT vs CLFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAIT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 14.7%
- 207.3% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 106.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 12.00x
CLFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- 19.6% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2%
- -6.3% margin vs TAIT's -27.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 72.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.3% margin vs TAIT's -27.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs CLFD's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.2% vs TAIT's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.0% ROA vs TAIT's -5.7%, ROIC 0.6% vs -0.7% |
TAIT vs CLFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TAIT vs CLFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TAIT and CLFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $136M annually — 38.4x TAIT's $4M. CLFD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAIT's -27.4%. On growth, CLFD holds the edge at -27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$972,000 | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $696,000 | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.6% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | -6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.4% | -27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -124.6% | -142.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TAIT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TAIT's 57.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $519M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $506M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.18x | -64.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.90x | 61.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.98x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TAIT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs TAIT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.5% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 85.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,735 for TAIT. Over the past 12 months, CLFD leads with a +20.2% total return vs TAIT's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLFD at 1.3% vs TAIT's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.9% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.3% | +106.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.8% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAIT and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAIT is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs TAIT's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.10 | $46.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $24.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.6% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 146K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TAIT is the only dividend payer here at 14.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
CLFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TAIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TAIT vs CLFD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAIT or CLFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TAIT or CLFD?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -42. 7% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAIT returned +207. 3% versus CLFD's +106. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TAIT or CLFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately 125% more volatile than TAIT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TAIT or CLFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLFD leads at -17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TAIT or CLFD?
Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
8% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLFD leads at 1. 4% versus -2. 5% for TAIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAIT leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TAIT or CLFD?
In this comparison, TAIT (14.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CLFD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TAIT or CLFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 14. 7% yield, +207. 3% 10Y return). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAIT: +207. 3%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TAIT and CLFD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TAIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock. TAIT pays a dividend while CLFD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.