Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $8M | $975M | $519M | $760M | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $803M | $136M | $592M | $697M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-972K | $28M | $-9M | $26M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | 26.6% | 37.2% | 25.3% | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | 5.6% | 1.4% | 6.5% | 8.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 21.5x | 72.1x | 22.3x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $17M | $9M | $67M | $48M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $128M | $21M | $3M | $83M |
TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taitron Components … (TAIT) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 471.9 | +371.9% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| Preformed Line Prod… (PLPC) | 100 | 696.1 | +596.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 12.00x
- PEG 0.82 vs PLPC's 9.54
- Beta 0.80, yield 14.7%, current ratio 12.00x
DAKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CLFD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LYTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2%
- 6.5% ROA vs TAIT's -5.7%, ROIC 9.5% vs -0.7%
PLPC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs DAKT's 156.0%
- 4.9% margin vs TAIT's -27.4%
- +159.0% vs TAIT's -19.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 34.4x), PEG 0.82 vs 9.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs TAIT's -27.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs CLFD's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PLPC's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.0% vs TAIT's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs TAIT's -5.7%, ROIC 9.5% vs -0.7% |
TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAKT leads in 1 of 6 categories
PLPC leads 1 • TAIT leads 0 • CLFD leads 0 • LYTS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TAIT and DAKT and PLPC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 226.4x TAIT's $4M. PLPC is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAIT's -27.4%. On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $803M | $136M | $592M | $697M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $65M | $6M | $51M | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$972,000 | $28M | -$9M | $26M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $696,000 | $62M | $15M | $38M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.6% | +26.6% | +37.2% | +25.3% | +30.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.6% | +5.6% | +1.4% | +6.5% | +8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | +3.4% | -6.3% | +4.3% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +7.7% | +10.8% | +6.4% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.4% | +21.6% | -27.1% | -0.5% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -124.6% | +117.0% | -142.5% | +11.1% | -8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DAKT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, TAIT trades at a 81% valuation discount to PLPC's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TAIT offers better value at 0.82x vs PLPC's 13.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $975M | $519M | $760M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $865M | $506M | $823M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.18x | -95.29x | -64.64x | 30.91x | 48.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.52x | 72.10x | 22.34x | 34.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | — | — | 1.82x | 13.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.90x | 16.42x | 61.46x | 17.03x | 21.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.98x | 1.29x | 3.46x | 1.33x | 2.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 3.50x | 2.05x | 3.26x | 3.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.47x | 21.01x | 21.94x | 50.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CLFD and LYTS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TAIT. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYTS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs TAIT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.5% | +9.6% | -3.4% | +10.9% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | +5.1% | -3.0% | +6.5% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +13.2% | +0.6% | +9.5% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +9.9% | +0.8% | +12.6% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.06x | 0.03x | 0.29x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$111M | -$13M | $63M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $128M | $21M | $3M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $17M | $9M | $67M | $48M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 37.31x | 85.32x | 13.52x | 39.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLPC five years ago would be worth $50,171 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,735 for TAIT. Over the past 12 months, PLPC leads with a +159.0% total return vs TAIT's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 57.8% vs TAIT's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.9% | +0.9% | +27.1% | +32.8% | +63.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +46.7% | +20.2% | +58.0% | +159.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | +293.1% | +3.9% | +100.0% | +144.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | +208.3% | -4.1% | +223.4% | +401.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.3% | +156.0% | +106.7% | +108.5% | +794.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.8% | +57.8% | +1.3% | +26.0% | +34.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAIT and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAIT is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TAIT's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.48x | 1.79x | 1.43x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.10 | $28.27 | $46.76 | $24.75 | $371.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $13.05 | $24.01 | $15.31 | $132.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.6% | +70.8% | +80.2% | +98.7% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 52.2 | 57.1 | 70.1 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 449K | 146K | 378K | 165K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TAIT and PLPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", CLFD as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy", PLPC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CLFD (target: $43) vs -20.4% for PLPC (target: $275). For income investors, TAIT offers the higher dividend yield at 14.68% vs PLPC's 0.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $43.00 | $27.00 | $275.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.7% | — | — | +0.8% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | — | — | $0.19 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
DAKT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PLPC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
TAIT vs DAKT vs CLFD vs LYTS vs PLPC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC?
On trailing P/E, Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Preformed Line Products Company at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, Daktronics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LSI Industries Inc. wins at 1. 31x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 54x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC?
Over the past 5 years, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) delivered a total return of +401.
7%, compared to -42. 7% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLPC returned +794. 9% versus CLFD's +106. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately 125% more volatile than TAIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for LSI Industries Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC?
Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
8% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLPC leads at 8. 2% versus -2. 5% for TAIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAIT leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 31x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 54x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 50. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLFD: 14. 7% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC?
In this comparison, TAIT (14.
7% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield), PLPC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DAKT, CLFD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TAIT or DAKT or CLFD or LYTS or PLPC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 14. 7% yield, +207. 3% 10Y return). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAIT: +207. 3%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAIT and DAKT and CLFD and LYTS and PLPC?
These companies operate in different sectors (TAIT (Technology) and DAKT (Technology) and CLFD (Technology) and LYTS (Technology) and PLPC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TAIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TAIT, LYTS pay a dividend while DAKT, CLFD, PLPC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.