Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $8M | $760M | $11.79B | $39.42B | $259.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $592M | $453M | $6.06B | $18.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-972K | $26M | $119M | $574M | $5.37B |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | 25.3% | 57.3% | 37.2% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | 6.5% | 18.1% | 10.8% | 35.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 22.3x | 94.3x | 34.4x | 37.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $67M | $13M | $3.47B | $15.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $3M | $403M | $2.15B | $3.23B |
TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taitron Components … (TAIT) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 12.00x
- PEG 0.82 vs VICR's 2.10
- Beta 0.80, yield 14.7%, current ratio 12.00x
LYTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2%
VICR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs ON's 10.0%
- +5.4% vs TAIT's -19.9%
- 16.6% ROA vs TAIT's -5.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs -0.7%
Among these 5 stocks, ON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TXN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 29.1% margin vs TAIT's -27.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 37.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs TAIT's -27.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs TAIT's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs TAIT's -5.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs -0.7% |
TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 1 of 6 categories
LYTS leads 1 • VICR leads 1 • TAIT leads 0 • ON leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 5201.1x TAIT's $4M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAIT's -27.4%. On growth, TXN holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $592M | $453M | $6.1B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $51M | $103M | $1.2B | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$972,000 | $26M | $119M | $574M | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $696,000 | $38M | $119M | $1.5B | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.6% | +25.3% | +57.3% | +37.2% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.6% | +6.5% | +18.1% | +10.8% | +35.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | +4.3% | +26.2% | +9.5% | +29.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +6.4% | +26.3% | +24.0% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.4% | -0.5% | +11.5% | +4.7% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -124.6% | +11.1% | +3.4% | +93.0% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LYTS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, TAIT trades at a 97% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TAIT offers better value at 0.82x vs VICR's 2.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $760M | $11.8B | $39.4B | $259.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $823M | $11.4B | $40.7B | $271.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.18x | 30.91x | 100.13x | 346.84x | 52.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.34x | 94.31x | 34.37x | 37.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | 1.82x | 2.23x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.90x | 17.03x | 197.81x | 28.42x | 33.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.98x | 1.33x | 28.91x | 6.57x | 14.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 3.26x | 16.50x | 5.38x | 16.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.94x | 98.86x | 27.79x | 99.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VICR and TXN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TAIT. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VICR scores 7/9 vs TAIT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.5% | +10.9% | +18.7% | +7.4% | +32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | +6.5% | +16.6% | +4.5% | +15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +9.5% | +8.9% | +6.1% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +12.6% | +5.7% | +6.2% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.29x | 0.02x | 0.45x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $63M | -$390M | $1.3B | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $3M | $403M | $2.1B | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $67M | $13M | $3.5B | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13.52x | — | 10.49x | 12.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,735 for TAIT. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs TAIT's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 82.5% vs TAIT's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.9% | +32.8% | +123.6% | +77.4% | +62.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +58.0% | +535.7% | +159.2% | +76.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | +100.0% | +507.9% | +24.9% | +83.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | +223.4% | +201.3% | +160.4% | +65.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.3% | +108.5% | +2704.1% | +1004.1% | +471.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.8% | +26.0% | +82.5% | +7.7% | +22.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAIT and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAIT is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TAIT's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.43x | 2.79x | 1.95x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.10 | $24.75 | $293.95 | $105.88 | $292.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $15.31 | $40.27 | $37.56 | $152.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.6% | +98.7% | +88.9% | +95.0% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 70.1 | 68.2 | 81.5 | 79.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 378K | 864K | 9.2M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TAIT and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", ON as "Buy", TXN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, TAIT offers the higher dividend yield at 14.68% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $245.00 | $62.40 | $253.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 7 | 45 | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.7% | +0.8% | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | $0.19 | — | — | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +3.5% | +0.6% |
TXN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LYTS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
TAIT vs LYTS vs VICR vs ON vs TXN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN?
On trailing P/E, Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, LSI Industries Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LSI Industries Inc. wins at 1. 31x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +223. 4%, compared to -42. 7% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus LYTS's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 251% more volatile than TAIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus 2. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus -2. 5% for TAIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 31x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) trades at 22. 3x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 72. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 10. 6% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN?
In this comparison, TAIT (14.
7% yield), TXN (1. 9% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. VICR, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TAIT or LYTS or VICR or ON or TXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 14. 7% yield, +207. 3% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAIT: +207. 3%, VICR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAIT and LYTS and VICR and ON and TXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TAIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TAIT, LYTS, TXN pay a dividend while VICR, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.