Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Semiconductors
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Plans
TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Semiconductors | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $868M | $124M | $3.92B | $2.04B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $229M | $109M | $901M | $0.00 | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $5M | $94M | $-238M | $-57M |
| Gross Margin | 43.0% | 67.3% | 44.4% | — | 42.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 10.7% | 12.1% | — | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 38.2x | 7.0x | 29.7x | — | 65.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5M | $303M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $23M | $766M | $258M | $78M |
TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Talkspace, Inc. (TALK) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 46.9 | -53.1% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 185.1 | +85.1% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 394.8 | +294.8% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TALK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 0.86 vs ACMR's 3.24
OPRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 65.9x)
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.24, yield 0.2%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs MNMD's 5.1%
- 10.4% margin vs CLOV's -2.6%
- 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MNMD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +214.0% vs OPRX's -30.1%
CLOV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 40.3% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.3% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 65.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs CLOV's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs OPRX's -30.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs MNMD's -70.7%, ROIC 3.9% vs -389.5% |
TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPRX leads 2 • MNMD leads 1 • TALK leads 1 • CLOV leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLOV and MNMD operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLOV's -2.6%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +62.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $229M | $109M | $901M | $0 | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $16M | $126M | -$191M | -$55M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $5M | $94M | -$238M | -$57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $12M | -$69M | -$174M | $55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.0% | +67.3% | +44.4% | — | +42.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +10.7% | +12.1% | — | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +4.7% | +10.4% | — | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +10.6% | -7.6% | — | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.3% | -0.2% | +9.4% | — | +62.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -76.1% | -163.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.6x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 81% valuation discount to TALK's 129.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 137.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $124M | $3.9B | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $830M | $105M | $3.5B | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 129.50x | 24.56x | 43.21x | -10.04x | -16.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.20x | 7.04x | 29.68x | — | 65.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 137.77x | 6.55x | 27.49x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.79x | 1.13x | 4.35x | — | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.69x | 0.98x | 2.06x | 5.56x | 4.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.62x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TALK delivers a 6.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-102 for MNMD. OPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACMR's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 8/9 vs CLOV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +4.2% | +6.1% | -102.5% | -17.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +3.0% | +3.9% | -70.7% | -9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.1% | +7.0% | -3.9% | -34.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +7.6% | +6.6% | -52.2% | -24.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.16x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | -$19M | -$463M | -$258M | -$78M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $23M | $766M | $258M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5M | $303M | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.26x | 20.44x | -21.81x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,266 for OPRX. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +214.0% total return vs OPRX's -30.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs OPRX's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.6% | -46.6% | +31.9% | +51.7% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.4% | -30.1% | +195.6% | +214.0% | -25.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +490.0% | -54.4% | +487.9% | +510.3% | +221.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.7% | -87.3% | +133.4% | -57.9% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.7% | +110.5% | +3065.8% | +512.1% | -72.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.7% | -23.0% | +80.5% | +82.7% | +47.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TALK is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs OPRX's 29.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 2.28x | 3.24x | 1.68x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.20 | $22.25 | $71.65 | $21.09 | $3.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $5.54 | $19.26 | $6.03 | $1.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +29.8% | +82.6% | +98.1% | +71.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 46.9 | 60.7 | 64.9 | 69.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 476K | 1.2M | 792K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TALK as "Hold", OPRX as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", MNMD as "Buy", CLOV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.25 | $17.00 | $40.00 | $20.00 | $3.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.11 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). OPRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
TALK vs OPRX vs ACMR vs MNMD vs CLOV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the stronger pick with 40. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 2% for ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV?
On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 24.
6x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 129. 5x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -87. 3% for OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus CLOV's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 276% more volatile than TALK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 16% for ACM Research, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is pulling ahead at 40. 3% versus 15. 2% for ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OPRX leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 65. 9x for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — 58. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TALK, OPRX, MNMD, CLOV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TALK or OPRX or ACMR or MNMD or CLOV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TALK: -48. 7%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TALK and OPRX and ACMR and MNMD and CLOV?
These companies operate in different sectors (TALK (Healthcare) and OPRX (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and MNMD (Healthcare) and CLOV (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.