Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.51B | $2.34B | $4.33B | $49M | $568M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.74B | $4.71B | $3.81B | $165M | $501M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-743M | $638M | $-285M | $12M | $-150M |
| Gross Margin | 2.3% | 43.9% | 70.3% | 72.8% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.9% | 31.1% | 12.8% | -4.0% | -10.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.8x | 6.4x | 12.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.24B | $4.49B | $5.71B | $23M | $351M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $363M | $76M | $10M | $28M | $141M |
TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) | 100 | 153.6 | +53.6% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 55.3 | -44.7% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | 100 | 103.3 | +3.3% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) | 100 | 118.3 | +18.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TALO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 57.3%, current ratio 1.30x
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
- 13.6% margin vs TALO's -42.7%
- 4.2% ROA vs WTI's -15.1%, ROIC 10.8% vs -32.5%
CRGY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.63, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.48x
- Better valuation composite
BATL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.71, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
WTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 65.4% 10Y total return vs TALO's -58.6%
- Beta 0.01 vs CIVI's 1.10
- +232.8% vs CIVI's +6.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs TALO's -42.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs CIVI's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +232.8% vs CIVI's +6.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs WTI's -15.1%, ROIC 10.8% vs -32.5% |
TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BATL leads in 1 of 6 categories
TALO leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • CRGY leads 0 • WTI leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 28.5x BATL's $165M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TALO's -42.7%. On growth, CRGY holds the edge at +24.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $4.7B | $3.8B | $165M | $501M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $437M | $3.4B | $1.7B | $74M | $80M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$743M | $638M | -$285M | $12M | -$150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $489M | $934M | $308M | $39M | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +43.9% | +70.3% | +72.8% | +21.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +31.1% | +12.8% | -4.0% | -10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.7% | +13.6% | -7.5% | +7.2% | -29.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +19.8% | +8.1% | +23.7% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | -8.1% | +24.5% | -37.0% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | -33.9% | -127.0% | +59.0% | -12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 87% valuation discount to CRGY's 24.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WTI's 8.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $2.3B | $4.3B | $49M | $568M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $6.8B | $10.0B | $44M | $779M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.34x | 3.24x | 24.26x | -1.32x | -3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.75x | 6.37x | 12.84x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.15x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.15x | 1.89x | 6.11x | — | 8.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 0.45x | 1.21x | 0.29x | 1.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 0.41x | 0.62x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.53x | 2.61x | 5.93x | 1.24x | 20.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-33 for TALO. TALO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRGY's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs WTI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.2% | +9.5% | -6.0% | +14.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | +4.2% | -2.6% | +2.4% | -15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +10.8% | +3.9% | -3.4% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | +12.1% | +4.9% | -1.8% | -6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.68x | 1.11x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $879M | $4.4B | $5.7B | -$5M | $210M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $363M | $76M | $10M | $28M | $141M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $4.5B | $5.7B | $23M | $351M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.36x | 2.80x | 2.26x | 0.57x | -1.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CRGY and WTI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIVI five years ago would be worth $13,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,362 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, WTI leads with a +232.8% total return vs CIVI's +6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRGY at 10.1% vs BATL's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.8% | -1.5% | +55.3% | +148.2% | +137.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.9% | +6.5% | +70.8% | +136.2% | +232.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | -41.7% | +33.4% | -52.8% | -9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.5% | +30.2% | -8.8% | -76.4% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | -87.5% | -8.8% | -71.2% | +65.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.6% | -16.5% | +10.1% | -22.2% | -3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRGY and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRGY currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 1.10x | 0.63x | -1.71x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.00 | $37.45 | $14.29 | $29.70 | $4.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.27 | $25.38 | $7.68 | $1.00 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +73.1% | +91.7% | +9.9% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 54.8 | 65.7 | 40.4 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 22.4M | 8.6M | 16.6M | 9.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TALO as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", CRGY as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", WTI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for CIVI (target: $31) vs -8.6% for TALO (target: $14). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs WTI's 1.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.75 | $31.00 | $12.80 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +18.2% | +3.6% | +100.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.98 | $0.47 | $2.96 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +18.3% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BATL leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Analyst Outlook. 5 categories are tied.
TALO vs CIVI vs CRGY vs BATL vs WTI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Crescent Energy Company at 24. 3x. On forward P/E, Crescent Energy Company is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI?
Over the past 5 years, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) delivered a total return of +30. 2%, compared to -76. 4% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTI returned +65. 4% versus CIVI's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately -164% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 111% for Crescent Energy Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crescent Energy Company grew EPS 161. 4% year-over-year, compared to -555. 8% for Talos Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -29. 9% for W&T Offshore, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -10. 5% for WTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CIVI: 13. 2% to $31. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), CRGY (3. 6% yield), WTI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TALO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TALO or CIVI or CRGY or BATL or WTI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -71. 2%, CIVI: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TALO and CIVI and CRGY and BATL and WTI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TALO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRGY is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CIVI, CRGY, BATL, WTI pay a dividend while TALO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.