Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.49B | $4.11B | $2.34B | $47M | $28.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.74B | $3.81B | $4.71B | $165M | $12.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-743M | $-285M | $638M | $12M | $2.15B |
| Gross Margin | 2.3% | 70.3% | 43.9% | 72.8% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | -24.9% | 12.8% | 31.1% | -4.0% | 18.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.0x | 6.8x | 12.4x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.24B | $5.71B | $4.49B | $23M | $8.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $363M | $10M | $76M | $28M | $1.43B |
TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) | 100 | 152.2 | +52.2% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 55.3 | -44.7% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TALO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CRGY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.63, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.48x
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.6x)
CIVI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
BATL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.71, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DVN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8%
DVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 99.0% 10Y total return vs CRGY's -12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
- 17.6% margin vs TALO's -42.7%
- Beta 0.05 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs TALO's -42.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DVN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs TALO's -13.2%, ROIC 12.3% vs -2.3% |
TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BATL leads in 2 of 6 categories
DVN leads 1 • TALO leads 0 • CRGY leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.2B annually — 74.2x BATL's $165M. DVN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TALO's -42.7%. On growth, CRGY holds the edge at +24.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $3.8B | $4.7B | $165M | $12.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $437M | $1.7B | $3.4B | $74M | $5.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$743M | -$285M | $638M | $12M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $489M | $308M | $934M | $39M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +70.3% | +43.9% | +72.8% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +12.8% | +31.1% | -4.0% | +18.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.7% | -7.5% | +13.6% | +7.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +8.1% | +19.8% | +23.7% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | +24.5% | -8.1% | -37.0% | -99.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | -127.0% | -33.9% | +59.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 86% valuation discount to CRGY's 23.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRGY's 6.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $4.1B | $2.3B | $47M | $28.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $9.8B | $6.8B | $42M | $35.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.29x | 23.02x | 3.24x | -1.28x | 10.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.05x | 6.75x | 12.43x | 8.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.13x | 5.98x | 1.89x | — | 4.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | 1.15x | 0.45x | 0.29x | 1.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.59x | 0.41x | — | 1.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.48x | 5.63x | 2.61x | 1.20x | 9.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-33 for TALO. DVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRGY's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs DVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.2% | -6.0% | +9.5% | +14.5% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | -2.6% | +4.2% | +2.4% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +3.9% | +10.8% | -3.4% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | +4.9% | +12.1% | -1.8% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 1.11x | 0.68x | — | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $879M | $5.7B | $4.4B | -$5M | $7.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $363M | $10M | $76M | $28M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $5.7B | $4.5B | $23M | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.36x | 2.26x | 2.80x | 0.57x | 7.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CRGY and BATL and DVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DVN five years ago would be worth $22,012 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs CIVI's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRGY at 8.4% vs BATL's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.6% | +47.5% | -1.5% | +140.3% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.7% | +62.6% | +6.8% | +128.8% | +52.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +27.2% | -41.7% | -54.3% | -2.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -12.8% | +31.9% | -77.5% | +120.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.0% | -12.8% | -86.2% | -72.1% | +99.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.3% | +8.4% | -16.5% | -23.0% | -0.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TALO and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALO currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.63x | 1.10x | -1.71x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.00 | $14.29 | $37.45 | $29.70 | $52.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.27 | $7.68 | $25.38 | $1.00 | $29.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +87.0% | +73.1% | +9.6% | +86.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 52.7 | 54.8 | 37.6 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 8.8M | 22.4M | 16.6M | 15.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TALO as "Buy", CRGY as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", BATL as "Buy", DVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.6% upside for DVN (target: $54) vs -7.8% for TALO (target: $14). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs DVN's 2.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.75 | $12.80 | $31.00 | — | $53.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 12 | 16 | 2 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +18.2% | +100.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.47 | $4.98 | $2.96 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +0.8% | +18.3% | 0.0% | +3.7% |
BATL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). DVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TALO vs CRGY vs CIVI vs BATL vs DVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Crescent Energy Company at 23. 0x. On forward P/E, Crescent Energy Company is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN?
Over the past 5 years, Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) delivered a total return of +120.
1%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DVN returned +99. 0% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately -164% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 111% for Crescent Energy Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crescent Energy Company grew EPS 161. 4% year-over-year, compared to -555. 8% for Talos Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -27. 9% for Talos Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -5. 9% for TALO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) trades at 6.
0x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DVN: 18. 6% to $53. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), CRGY (3. 8% yield), DVN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TALO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TALO or CRGY or CIVI or BATL or DVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TALO and CRGY and CIVI and BATL and DVN?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TALO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRGY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CRGY, CIVI, BATL, DVN pay a dividend while TALO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.