TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
Beverages - Alcoholic
Market Cap$8.10B
5Y Perf.+13.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TAP vs BG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.02B
5Y Perf.+217.3%
TAP vs BG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TAP | BG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $8.10B | $24.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.19B | $80.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.11B | $686M |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | -20.3% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $6.30B | $16.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $897M | $1.14B |
TAP vs BG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TAP
BG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 317.3 | +217.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAP vs BG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Molson Coors Beverage Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
The Income Pick
TAP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta -0.01, yield 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.01, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.55x
- Beta -0.01, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.55x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
The Growth Play
BG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 140.3% 10Y total return vs TAP's -41.4%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs TAP's -4.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BG | 32.4% revenue growth vs TAP's -4.2% |
| Value | TAP | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | BG | 0.9% margin vs TAP's -18.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TAP | Lower D/E ratio (59.8% vs 97.3%) |
| Dividends | TAP | 4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BG's 2.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BG | +66.8% vs TAP's -20.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BG | 1.6% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 3.3% vs -10.1% |
TAP vs BG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TAP vs BG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTAPLAGGINGBG
BGBunge Global S.A.
2leads
TAPMolson Coors Beverage…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TAP3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BG5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TAP1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TAP and BG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BG is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.5B annually — 7.2x TAP's $11.2B. BG is the more profitable business, keeping 0.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAP's -18.9%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TAPMolson Coors Beve… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.2B | $80.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.5B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.1B | $686M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +5.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +87.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | -76.4% |
Evenly matched — TAP and BG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TAP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TAPMolson Coors Beve… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $24.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.5B | $39.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.98x | 25.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.17x | 14.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.58x | — |
TAP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BG delivers a 4.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TAP. TAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TAP scores 4/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TAPMolson Coors Beve… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.1% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.6% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $897M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.3B | $17.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.99x | 3.10x |
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,585 for TAP. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +66.8% total return vs TAP's -20.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs TAP's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TAPMolson Coors Beve… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.0% | +34.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.8% | +66.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.8% | +46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.1% | +49.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.4% | +140.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +13.5% |
BG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAP and BG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BG's 0.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BG currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs TAP's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TAPMolson Coors Beve… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.01x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.57 | $133.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.64 | $71.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — TAP and BG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TAP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TAP as "Hold" and BG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.0% upside for TAP (target: $48) vs 8.0% for BG (target: $134). For income investors, TAP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs BG's 2.23%.
| Metric | TAPMolson Coors Beve… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.30 | $133.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.92 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | +2.3% |
TAP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallMolson Coors Beverage Compa… (TAP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TAP vs BG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAP or BG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Bunge Global S. A. (BG) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bunge Global S. A. (BG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAP or BG?
On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 9.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAP or BG?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -14. 1% for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BG returned +140. 3% versus TAP's -41. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAP or BG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus Bunge Global S. A. 's 0. 25β — meaning BG is approximately -2140% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAP or BG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -4. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bunge Global S. A. grew EPS -38. 4% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAP or BG?
Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 2% net margin versus -19. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BG leads at 1. 5% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAP leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAP or BG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 9.
2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Bunge Global S. A. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAP: 12. 0% to $48. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAP or BG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 2. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. (BG).
09Is TAP or BG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
01), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -41. 4%, BG: +140. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAP and BG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TAP: 2.0% · BG: 87.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.