TAYD vs CW vs KTOS vs DRS vs AVAV

For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the cheapest at 18. 1x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 445. 3x. On forward P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taylor Devices, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +467.

8%, compared to +63. 2% for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 0% versus TAYD's +224. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KTOS is approximately 210% more volatile than TAYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 52% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 3. 8% for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leonardo DRS, Inc. grew EPS 28. 7% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for AeroVironment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVAV leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAYD leads at 20. 8% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAYD leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 76. 4x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 59. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 2% to $343. 60.

In this comparison, DRS (0.

9% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TAYD, KTOS, AVAV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Leonardo DRS, Inc.

(DRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 0. 9% yield). AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRS: +54. 0%, AVAV: +498. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TAYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DRS pays a dividend while TAYD, CW, KTOS, AVAV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.