TAYD vs TDY vs CW vs KTOS vs DRS

For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the cheapest at 18. 1x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taylor Devices, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +449.

0%, compared to +44. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 0% versus TAYD's +224. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KTOS is approximately 210% more volatile than TAYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 52% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 3. 8% for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leonardo DRS, Inc. grew EPS 28. 7% year-over-year, compared to 9. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAYD leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAYD leads at 20. 8% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAYD leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 73. 5x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 56. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 94. 0% to $110. 58.

In this comparison, DRS (0.

9% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TAYD, TDY, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Leonardo DRS, Inc.

(DRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 0. 9% yield). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRS: +54. 0%, KTOS: +1253%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TAYD (Industrials) and TDY (Technology) and CW (Industrials) and KTOS (Industrials) and DRS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TAYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DRS pays a dividend while TAYD, TDY, CW, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.