Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Distribution
TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $876M | $911M | $1.69B | $1.62B | $90.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $735M | $424M | $4.18B | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115M | $9M | $504M | $-1.82B | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 89.3% | 60.2% | 76.2% | 34.2% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 3.4% | 14.8% | -4.1% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 8.1x | 7.3x | 5.5x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $454M | $269M | $3.97B | $8.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $168M | $159M | $551M | $532M | $3.98B |
TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theravance Biopharm… (TBPH) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 163.9 | +63.9% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 464.2 | +364.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 66.9%, EPS growth 279.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- 66.9% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- +71.8% vs PRGO's -52.0%
PCRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.11, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
- Beta 0.11 vs PRGO's 1.21, lower leverage
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 7.3x)
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 339.0% 10Y total return vs INVA's 95.6%
- PEG 0.43 vs INVA's 0.71
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.9% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 7.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs PRGO's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.8% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs 3.7% |
TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 1 of 6 categories
INVA leads 1 • MCK leads 1 • TBPH leads 0 • PCRX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TBPH and INVA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 3675.1x TBPH's $110M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, TBPH holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $735M | $424M | $4.2B | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $95M | $86M | $58M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115M | $9M | $504M | -$1.8B | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $269M | $133M | $181M | $108M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.3% | +60.2% | +76.2% | +34.2% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +3.4% | +14.8% | -4.1% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +104.3% | +1.3% | +118.9% | -43.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +18.1% | +42.6% | +2.6% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +5.0% | +10.6% | -7.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.0% | -30.0% | +4.0% | -56.4% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 95% valuation discount to PCRX's 144.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCK offers better value at 0.43x vs INVA's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $876M | $911M | $1.7B | $1.6B | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $784M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $5.1B | $94.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.26x | 144.69x | 6.94x | -1.14x | 19.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.76x | 8.13x | 7.31x | 5.53x | 16.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.67x | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.70x | 6.90x | 7.43x | 15.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.15x | 1.25x | 3.97x | 0.38x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.95x | 1.50x | 1.65x | 0.55x | 11.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.67x | 6.66x | 8.63x | 11.17x | 14.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. INVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.4% | +1.3% | +47.6% | -50.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +25.5% | +0.7% | +32.4% | -19.8% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +2.3% | +14.2% | +3.7% | +74.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +2.8% | +12.4% | +4.3% | +43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.66x | 0.23x | 1.35x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | $296M | -$282M | $3.4B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $168M | $159M | $551M | $532M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $454M | $269M | $4.0B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.89x | 2.37x | 63.45x | -7.20x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $37,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,802 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, TBPH leads with a +71.8% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCK at 26.4% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | -5.4% | +15.2% | -13.6% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.8% | -7.1% | +23.2% | -52.0% | +7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.1% | -45.2% | +96.0% | -58.1% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | -62.0% | +94.5% | -60.3% | +270.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | -52.2% | +95.6% | -77.7% | +339.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.5% | -18.2% | +25.1% | -25.2% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INVA and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCK is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRGO's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.41x | 0.11x | 1.21x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.03 | $27.64 | $25.15 | $28.44 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.33 | $18.80 | $16.52 | $9.23 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +83.8% | +91.0% | +41.2% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 45.5 | 44.7 | 53.1 | 21.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 618K | 663K | 604K | 3.3M | 782K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBPH as "Hold", PCRX as "Hold", INVA as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 27.4% for PCRX (target: $30). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.82% vs MCK's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $29.50 | $40.00 | $36.20 | $994.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 36 | 10 | 36 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +16.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRGO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). INVA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TBPH vs PCRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Theravance Biopharma, Inc.
(TBPH) is the stronger pick with 66. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 144. 7x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McKesson Corporation wins at 0. 43x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 0. 71x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +270.
4%, compared to -62. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +339. 0% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Perrigo Company plc's 1. 21β — meaning PRGO is approximately -7506% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Theravance Biopharma, Inc.
(TBPH) is pulling ahead at 66. 9% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, TBPH leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK?
Theravance Biopharma, Inc.
(TBPH) is the more profitable company, earning 98. 5% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 98. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -12. 3% for TBPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBPH leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 43x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 0. 71x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for McKesson Corporation — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. TBPH, PCRX, INVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBPH or PCRX or INVA or PRGO or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), +339. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCK: +339. 0%, TBPH: -8. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBPH and PCRX and INVA and PRGO and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while TBPH, PCRX, INVA, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.